The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

Persistent smog angers Beijing residents, media

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
By William Wan
The Washington Post.
Published:
BEIJING - It takes a lot to faze residents of a city as smog-filled as Beijing. But after four straight days of air so hazardous it has defied government charts and labels, the disbelief and outrage are palpable.
Government vehicles have been pulled off the roads, production slowed at thousands of factories and children have been told to stay indoors. On Monday, even China's state-run media - which has long avoided criticizing the government on such topics - ran reports and editorials acknowledging the problem and demanding solutions.
The haze that has settled over the capital highlights a thorny situation for China's newly elevated slate of leaders, who have promised transparency and reform. Delivering those, however, on such persistent, intractable problems as China's environment may prove difficult.
The trouble began last week with a growing fog over the city. By Friday, it had become hard to see office buildings down the street. By Saturday, the smog had reached epic proportions, stinging residents' eyes, causing respiratory problems and sparking a panicked run on stores selling masks and air filters.
Beijing's municipal government reported air-quality-index levels as high as 500 Saturday night, based on a scale by which U.S. experts consider anything above 150 as "unhealthy" and anything from 301 to 500 as "hazardous."
But that was just half the story, because the Chinese monitors stop recording at 500.
An air monitor run by the U.S. Embassy that sends out hourly tweets - and has been the subject of much official Chinese rancor in the past - showed the air quality topping out at 755, an astonishing level the embassy calls, for lack of a better description, "beyond index."
And there it stayed, lingering between "hazardous" and "beyond index," until Monday night, when it finally downgraded to "very unhealthy."
Although the pollution crisis is possibly the worst in recent memory, some experts and environmental activists say it is the government's reaction that has surprised them most.
The Communist Party's main mouthpiece, People's Daily, ran a front-page editorial Monday, calling the darkened sky a "suffocating siege." China Daily said there should be a "healthy debate" on why there are not stricter government regulation for cars, urban density and tree planting. Even the nationalistic newspaper Global Times called for more transparency and less fixation on the kind of economic growth that turns a blind eye to environmental consequences.
Some believe the reversal of state media on the issue has been driven by public pressure, as well as the effect of new media information, such as the U.S. Embassy's air quality tweets.
China's officials and state media, however, have not explained their approach, limiting most of their discussion to what is causing the fog and possible solutions.
Even that subject has proved elusive. Official experts have been quoted in state media blaming everything from weather patterns and factories in neighboring provinces to increased cars, hilly terrain and more coal burnt for heat amid a cold snap.
The latest speculation in state-run media, however, has brought what could be the best news of all for Beijing's leaders and residents. By Monday night, Xinhua News Agency was predicting that a cold front would move through Tuesday night, likely clearing out the lingering haze.

More Nation & World Headlines

NEWSLETTER

HeraldNet Headlines

Top stories and breaking news updates

Calendar

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus