THE HERALD   EVERETT, WASHINGTON
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus
Welcome, Guest | Register | Sign In
New: Newsletters - Register | Sign In
 Home   Work        Follow Business_Herald on Twitter @Business_Herald   RSS feed RSS
Published: Tuesday, February 5, 2013, 1:44 p.m.

Value of turbo engines faulted

Sign up for Weekly business news
DETROIT -- Consumer Reports is warning car buyers that turbocharged engines may not deliver the speed or fuel economy they expect.

The magazine said Tuesday that its tests showed turbocharged models from Ford, Hyundai and Kia are less efficient than competitors. It also said the turbocharged Chevrolet Cruze got little extra power or fuel economy than a non-turbocharged engine.

The magazine did praise a turbocharged four-cylinder from BMW.

Turbochargers pump extra air into engines so more fuel can be added to boost power. Carmakers charge more for them, promising extra power.

Consumer Reports said a new Ford Fusion with an optional 1.6-liter EcoBoost engine was slower and got lower fuel economy than a Toyota Camry, Honda Accord or Nissan Altima with regular engines.

Ford said it can't speak for Consumer Reports' tests, but its surveys show EcoBoost customers are satisfied with their fuel economy.

A spokeswoman for General Motors Co. says the Cruze turbocharged engine provides more power and better acceleration when compared with the non-turbocharged engine. She said people who drive with a heavy foot on the accelerator of a turbocharged engine won't see a lot of gas mileage benefits.

Related

Comments


HeraldNet highlights

Living up to expectations
Living up to expectations: Sounders are one of the MLS's best teams
They've got your number
They've got your number: 'The 206' is back and no area code is safe from jokes
33 years ago
33 years ago: Photos and The Herald's 1980 page on Mount St. Helens
Your guide to summer
Your guide to summer: Look ahead to fun in the sun with fairs, festivals, concerts