‘No more baby parts,’ Colorado gunman said November 29, 2015
In wake of Colorado shooting, Obama calls for more gun controls November 29, 2015
Colorado shooting suspect called loner who left few clues November 28, 2015
Planned Parenthood shooting suspect was adrift, alienated November 28, 2015
3 killed, 9 wounded in attack at Planned Parenthood November 27, 2015
Armed older couple gets upper hand on burglar November 22, 2015
Gun control advocates refocus on background checks October 29, 2015
The average gun owner now owns 8 guns October 22, 2015
People were shot by toddlers every week this year October 15, 2015
Finger points anywhere but at gun attitudes October 14, 2015
Under a revised bill considered during a committee hearing Wednesday, lawmakers say agencies that conduct background checks would have to destroy records of the search once it's complete. Opponents of the bill had expressed concern that the transaction records would essentially provide a foundation for a registry of gun owners.
Rep. Jamie Pedersen, D-Seattle, said he received hundreds of emails related to the bill. Some were generic emails or form letters, but he said others included reasonable suggestions.
"There are quite a few people who were very thoughtful," Pedersen said. "Those comments resulted in the changes."
The new bill also allows private parties to bypass the background check if the buyer already has a concealed pistol license. People involved in a transaction can also skip the background check if a request for such information goes unanswered for three days, responding to concerns that the federal system could be unavailable for periods of time. The new measure also removes a provision that allowed a state agency to request that more detailed information be submitted as part of the background check process.
At its core, the bill is designed to require background checks for private gun transactions. People already have to undergo a background check if they purchase a weapon from a federally licensed firearms dealer, but supporters of the measure are concerned that criminals and mentally ill people can simply seek out a private transaction in order to acquire weapons.
Opponents, however, said criminals will still find ways to get guns.
Despite the changes, Brian Judy, the Washington state liaison for the National Rifle Association, said he still had concerns about the bill. He believes that local law enforcement would be unable to conduct background checks and that gun dealers may lose money on the proposed $20 fee for conducting the checks, essentially freezing private gun transactions.
He argued that it would disproportionately impact law-abiding citizens.
"This is a misdirected program," Judy said. "It's not going to work."
House lawmakers are looking to move ahead with the measure next week. It has support on the committee of Republican Rep. Mike Hope, a Seattle police officer previously supported by the NRA. The Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs also supports the idea.
It's not clear if the measure has the votes to pass in the state Senate, where Republican Leader Mark Schoesler, of Ritzville, indicated that the measure wouldn't have much support in his caucus.
"I think it's highly divisive and it's not broadly supported," he said.
More Northwest Headlines
Spokane utility customers receive gift cards after long power outage 7:52 a.m. Man convicted of killing judge in 1974 seeks DNA testing Thanksgiving weekend spending stumps retailers Endangered fisher to be reintroduced into Cascades Skating grandfather dies after falling through ice near Yelm Driver arrested following crash in Oregon that killed his passenger Trailer used by Kiwanis for fundraiser is vandalized Pedestrian struck, killed by light-rail train in Portland
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.