In the Wednesday ruling, Judge Robert Sweet of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York also agreed with Facebook's claims that the plaintiffs could not prove that they owned Facebook stock at the time of the alleged wrongdoing.
The lawsuits and other still remaining alleged that analysts at large underwriting investment banks cut their financial forecasts for Facebook just before the IPO and told only a handful of clients. Facebook and the banks say nothing about its process was illegal.
Facebook says it is pleased with the ruling.
- Off the Wire: Woman, 104, forced to lie about age on Facebook 2/21/13
MORE HBJ HEADLINES
More homes land on market in county, but still too few FDA to establish rules for e-cigarettes Briefs: Alaska USA Foundation donates $10,000 to Children's Miracle Network Kellogg’s sales decline as cereals remain sluggish Kansas wheat crop seen as rebounding 19 percent Consumer watchdog proposes ban on bank arbitration clauses