In the Wednesday ruling, Judge Robert Sweet of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York also agreed with Facebook's claims that the plaintiffs could not prove that they owned Facebook stock at the time of the alleged wrongdoing.
The lawsuits and other still remaining alleged that analysts at large underwriting investment banks cut their financial forecasts for Facebook just before the IPO and told only a handful of clients. Facebook and the banks say nothing about its process was illegal.
Facebook says it is pleased with the ruling.
- Off the Wire: Woman, 104, forced to lie about age on Facebook 2/21/13
MORE HBJ HEADLINES
WSU to study rare earth elements in Everett Buffett to acquire Oregon aerospace firm in $37.2 billion deal US Postal Service reports $586 million net loss for spring 1:24 p.m. Bring on the bacon fries —Pork belly prices sizzle 1:25 p.m. Parent of Columbia House files for bankruptcy protection 1:26 p.m. Alibaba spends $4.6 billion on Suning in Ma’s biggest deal 1:23 p.m.
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.