In the Wednesday ruling, Judge Robert Sweet of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York also agreed with Facebook's claims that the plaintiffs could not prove that they owned Facebook stock at the time of the alleged wrongdoing.
The lawsuits and other still remaining alleged that analysts at large underwriting investment banks cut their financial forecasts for Facebook just before the IPO and told only a handful of clients. Facebook and the banks say nothing about its process was illegal.
Facebook says it is pleased with the ruling.
- Off the Wire: Woman, 104, forced to lie about age on Facebook 2/21/13
MORE HBJ HEADLINES
Already, EvCC to expand Advanced Manufacturing center United States, 11 Pacific Rim countries reach trade deal 6:49 a.m. Entrepreneurship 101: Donít let rising labor costs sink your ship Brief: Open house to show off Xfinity Arena's new scoreboard Why are raises elusive with record U.S. job openings? Arlington firm has high hopes for 'Safer Choice' eco-logo
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.