Win tickets to Evergreen State Fair concert
The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions
In Our View: The coal-train reaction


Coal's political fault line

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
Published:
A state Senate bill to hasten permitting for major industrial projects magnifies the fault line in the debate over a proposed coal-export facility at Cherry Point near Bellingham. (And hell hath no fury like coal opponents provoked.)
SB 5805, a bill sponsored by Sen. Steve Hobbs, D-Lake Stevens, illustrates the problem of contingency, the need to wide angle legislation to gauge potential outcomes, and the good and ill that flows from creative policymaking.
As The Herald's Jerry Cornfield reported Monday, Hobbs' bill is designed to benefit a long-delayed sand and gravel mine in Shine on the North Olympic Peninsula. The bill's broad-brush language creates a catchall, however. Eligible projects would swell to include "the basic commodities of transportation, energy development, conservation or efficiency." For lobbyists and Olympia wonks, idle language is the devil's workshop. In response to the pushback, Hobbs said that he'll work to cinch up language before the bill reaches the senate floor.
Although Hobbs backs the Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point, he says the focus of his bill is gravel, not coal. Fair enough. The bill would also nix the requirement that affected communities provide written support for projects of statewide significance. Whether a project centers on gravel, coal, or rutabagas, it's difficult to see how marginalizing local communities aligns with the public interest. Coal or no, this is an ill-conceived bill.
"It is beyond me why the Senate would push this explosive, politically charged legislation that fast-tracks coal exports by effectively eliminating any meaningful role for local communities," said Rep. Reuven Carlyle, D-Seattle.
The legislation is a pretext for coal-train skeptics to seize and refine their strategy, concentrating on the economic, transportation and health impacts associated with Cherry Point. Coal exports are interstate commerce, and the feds and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will ultimately be the deciders. In the interim, legislators have a fiduciary responsibility to examine and understand the economic fallout, working to mitigate the impact on cities stretching from Spokane to Everett.
Hobbs' bill, notwithstanding its intent, underscores the contingent nature of politics. A trial balloon by California lawmakers to siphon Columbia River water helped spur the National Environmental Policy Act. The Senate testimony of President Nixon's pompous science adviser, Lee DuBridge, so angered lawmakers that it ensured creation of the Council on Environmental Quality. Consequences and intent are often mutually exclusive. SB 5805 spotlights the coal debate, but the outcome is anyone's guess.

More Editorials Headlines

NEWSLETTER

HeraldNet Headlines

Top stories and breaking news updates

Calendar

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus