The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions
Herald staff | needtoknow@heraldnet.com
Published: Sunday, August 11, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

The high cost of initiative campaigns

Washington can pretty much count on a multimillion-dollar battle on a statewide ballot measure every fall. This year is no exception. Supporters and opponents of Initiative 522, which deals with labeling of certain processed foods, already have pulled in around $4 million combined before the campaign ramps up. Will having millions assure victory? More often than not the side which shells out the most money succeeds, whether it's passing or defeating a measure. Here are some highlights of initiative campaign spending since 1973, when the state first required public disclosure.

Most spending in support

Regardless of outcome

1. $20,115,326
Initiative 1183 (2011)
Privatize liquor sales
$12,351,656 spent by opponents
Yes: 58.7% No: 41.3%

2. $16,042,629
Initiative 1107 (2010)
End sales tax on candy and soda
$426,828 spent by opponents
Yes: 60.4% No: 39.6%

3. $14,784,515
Referendum 74 (2012)
Same-sex marriage
$2,975,561 spent by opponents
Yes: 53.7% No: 46.3%

4. $11,401,371
Initiative 1240 (2012)
Charter schools
$724,167 spent by opponents
Yes: 50.7% No: 49.3%

5. $9,513,197
Initiative 330 (2005)
Healthcare liability reform
$6,168,557 spent by opponents
Yes: 43.3% No: 56.7%

6. $6,259,692*
Referendum 48 (1997)
Publicly financed sports stadiums
$729,747 spent by opponents
Yes: 51.1% No: 48.9%
* Excludes $4.2 million paid by Paul Allen for cost of the special election

Most opposition spending

Regardless of outcome

1. $12,351,656
Initiative 1183 (2011)
Privatize liquor sales
$20,115,326 spent by supporters
Yes: 58.7% No: 41.3%

2. $11,526,117
Referendum 67 (2007)
Insurance reform
$3,912,555 spent by supporters
Yes: 56.7% No: 43.3%

3. $9,170,339
Initiative 1100 (2010)
Privatize liquor sales
$6,062,834 spent by supporters
Yes: 46.6% No: 53.4%

4. $6,639,957
Initiative 892 (2004)
Expand non-tribal gambling
$1,063,839 spent by supporters
Yes: 38.5% No: 61.5%

5. $6,168,557
Initiative 330 (2005)
Health-care liability reform
$9,513,197 spent by supporters
Yes: 43.3% No: 56.7%

6. $6,349,842
Initiative 1098 (2010)
Establish state income tax
$6,423,302 spent by supporters
Yes: 35.9% No: 64.1%

Lowest spending for passage

Successful campaigns

1. $14,006
Initiative 316 (1975)
Mandatory death penalty for first-degree murder
$3,227 spent by opponents
Yes: 69.1% No: 30.9%

2. $20,865
Initiative 345 (1977)
Eliminate sales tax on food
$10,994 spent by opponents
Yes: 54.0% No: 46.0%

3. $46,433
Initiative 601 (1993)
Limit tax increases
$2,050,779 spent by opponents
Yes: 51.2% No: 48.8%

Least spent to defeat a measure

$11,157
Initiative 729 (2000)
Charter schools
$3,250,695 spent by supporters
Yes: 48.2% No: 51.8%

Sources: State Public Disclosure Commission, Secretary of State


Sign up for HeraldNet headlines Newsletter
See sample | Privacy policy

Most recent Need to Know posts

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.



HeraldNet highlights

Humoody's Way
Humoody's Way: Blinded at 2, Snohomish boy lives with no holds barred
Good times in Snohomish
Good times in Snohomish: Kla Ha Ya Days full of fun (gallery)
Labor of love
Labor of love: Volunteer crews work hard to maintain Pacific Crest Trail
Right man for the job
Right man for the job: AquaSox's Valle equipped to handle a difficult situation