Aerospace blog: 'Sharp questions' posed at Machinists district meeting November 26, 2013
Boeing announces $101.5B in orders from Gulf November 17, 2013
"We have a number of alternatives," McNerney told reporters at the Dubai Air Show on Monday, adding that the goal is to find sites that provide a competitive price and low risk. "We are going through an evaluation right now."
Boeing's Machinists union voted against an eight-year contract extension last week that would have cut pension and other benefits while keeping 777 work in Washington state. A manufacturing shift for the revamp of the best-selling wide-body would be a blow to Everett, Seattle and Puget Sound area, where Boeing was founded in 1916.
A 777-9 seating more than 400 people due from 2020 and a smaller -8 with room for around 350 were formally introduced yesterday with a combined 259 orders from Dubai-based Emirates, Etihad Airways PJSC of Abu Dhabi and Qatar Airways Ltd., together with Deutsche Lufthansa AG, which had previously committed to a model that features a new wing and engine.
The Middle East's dominance of the backlong is not a concern, according to McNerney. "I am highly confident this will be a big global success on every continent around the world," he said.
Boeing is also focused on fixing reliability issues that some customers are experiencing with their 787-8 Dreamliners, McNerney said, adding that normal levels of reliability should be achieved "by the middle of next year at the latest."
To contact the reporter on this story: Robert Wall in London at firstname.lastname@example.org
- Aerospace blog: 'Sharp questions' posed at Machinists district meeting 11/26/13
- Boeing announces $101.5B in orders from Gulf 11/17/13
MORE HBJ HEADLINES
Why are raises elusive with record U.S. job openings? Arlington firm has high hopes for 'Safer Choice' eco-logo Cage-free eggs will change the industry Russiaís 2nd largest airline in crisis as bankruptcy looms Wal-Mart cuts HQ 'to become a more agile company' Court upholds $236 million verdict against Exxon Mobil
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.