The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Thursday, December 12, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

Concern there for struggling U.S. workers

Americans don't care much about rising economic inequality, recent surveys suggest. But that's not quite right.
The public may know that the top 10 percent pulled in about half of pretax income in 2012 -- and that income inequality is the widest it's been since right before the Great Depression. Its brain understands that these trends are not good for the society.
But Americans express far less concern about the U.S. income gap than do the French, Brits and Germans about theirs. Meanwhile, the ratio between the other countries' top 20 percent and bottom 20 percent is a fraction of ours. How do we explain these findings from a Pew Research Center study?
The numbers are probably solid, but the interpretation of them is tricky. It's not that most Americans regard growing income disparities as a non-problem. It's that they are more concerned about the "why" of them than the fact of them.
Ours is a work culture. We respect work. The emphasis on time devoted to the job may come with a price -- a less full personal and family life -- but it is good for the economy.
Americans look down on those deemed outside the work culture. And most such people are poor. The problem is seen as a broken work ethic rather than a frayed safety net or shifting economy.
One need not be a conservative to regard many in this group as lazy, preferring to milk various government programs (or relatives) rather than work a job. Some economists describe them in less judgmental ways -- as unable to respond to the economic incentives that drive the rest of us.
Whatever. Our perpetually unemployed population is growing as many able-bodied, willing-to-work people find themselves without salable skills. Often demoralized by the low pay, some stop trying and drift into the world of non-work.
But when struggling workers do get jobs, the American public stands behind them, and incomes become an issue. Exhibit A is the broad support for raising the federal minimum wage to $9 an hour, from the current $7.25.
Not surprisingly, 91 percent of Democrats are in favor, according to a Gallup poll. But more than half of Republicans surveyed, 58 percent, also back it, as do 76 percent of independents.
Of course, an actual hike in the minimum wage requires a vote of Congress, where fast-food outlets and other payers of low wages have considerable clout. In March, the Republican-controlled House voted against a bill that would have raised the minimum to $10.10 by 2015.
It's true that one cannot set the minimum wage at an unrealistically high level without loss of jobs or replacement of many workers with machines. But modest increases seem to have little effect on employment. It also helps to know that the minimum wage in 1968 was $10.77 in today's dollars. Adjusted for inflation, the minimum wage is now 33 percent lower than it was back then.
When speaking in vague terms about social programs, Americans and Danes reflect famously different views. But they're on the same page when it comes to aiding those who try, according to a study by two professors at Aarhus University in Denmark.
They presented this scenario: "Imagine a man who is currently on social welfare. He has always had a regular job, but has now been the victim of a work-related injury. He is very motivated to get back to work again."
There was virtually no daylight between Danes and Americans in describing the man as "unlucky" and deserving of help rather than "lazy."
Do Americans care about economic inequality? They do, but with asterisks attached.
Froma Harrop is a Providence Journal columnist.

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...

Herald Editorial Board

Jon Bauer, Opinion Editor: jbauer@heraldnet.com

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer: cmacpherson@heraldnet.com

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor: npattison@heraldnet.com

Josh O'Connor, Publisher: joconnor@heraldnet.com

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to letters@heraldnet.com, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at cmacpherson@heraldnet.com or 425-339-3472.

HeraldNet highlights

A future recreation station
A future recreation station: Skate park, playgrounds coming to Cavelero Hill
Gas tax can't keep pace
Gas tax can't keep pace: Why revenues aren't keeping up with state's needs
Joining the Wolf Pack
Joining the Wolf Pack: Glacier Peak kicker Pettit to go to Nevada as a preferred walk-on
All about action
All about action: Everett Eagles rugby 'like football that doesn't stop'
SnoCoSocial