The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Saturday, December 21, 2013, 4:03 p.m.

Pilot gets to keep plane after alcohol importation

FAIRBANKS, Alaska -- A 70-year-old Fairbanks pilot won't have to forfeit an airplane as part of an alcohol importation conviction.
Charter pilot Ken Jouppi allowed a passenger to bring cans of beer on a flight to a dry village. He served three days in jail.
Alaska law permits the seizure of planes used to "import" alcohol into local-option dry communities.
But Jouppi's attorney argued Jouppi never imported alcohol, because his plane never left the tarmac in April 2012, when Alaska State Troopers executed a search warrant on the aircraft.
Judge Patrick Hammers also fined Jouppi $1,500. The beer equaled about seven gallons of alcohol.
Hammers originally called for the plane's seizure, but determined in an order issued last week that Jouppi's failure to reach the dry community meant he didn't import alcohol.
Jouppi's lawyers argued said their client wasn't aware of what was in the groceries being placed on the flight to Beaver. However, state prosecutors said Jouppi is the charter of choice for bootleggers because of his "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
"Dry" or "damp" villages are communities that have passed laws banning or restricting the sale of alcohol, where a 750-milliliter bottle can fetch up to $250.
The misdemeanor trial was an offshoot of a larger bootlegging investigation against Jouppi's company, KenAir. The trial dealt with the circumstances of April 3, 2012, when troopers executed a search warrant on Jouppi's Cessna 206.
Jouppi is appealing the entire conviction, but for now, at least gets to keep his plane.
"Forfeitures are not favored in the law," Hammers said in his ruling. "A statute which imposes forfeiture must be strictly construed. Its effects cannot be extended beyond its plain, ordinary, and usual meaning, applied with common sense."
In this case, he said, the "plain, ordinary and usual" meaning of the word "import" doesn't apply to beer sitting on a tarmac bound for a destination.
Story tags » Crime

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

loading...

HeraldNet highlights

Looking for a friend?
Looking for a friend?: Animals up for adoption at the Everett shelter (7 new photos)
A haircut for a dollar?
A haircut for a dollar?: At Everett barber school, it'll only cost you a hair
What's your number?
What's your number?: Find out what your Seahawks jersey says about you
Cooking for kickoff
Cooking for kickoff: Football-themed recipes for your Super Bowl crowd
SnoCoSocial