The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions

Calendar

Splash! Summer guide

HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Friday, January 24, 2014, 2:17 p.m.

Police leaders seek more officer accountability

SEATTLE — Law enforcement leaders in Washington state want more stringent laws to purge officers who lie or commit crimes.
Lawmakers began considering a bill Friday that would give a state commission more power to decertify officers.
Washougal Police Chief Ron Mitchell testified in favor of the proposal, describing how one of his officers was fired and then convicted of assaulting a man who was restrained in the back of his patrol car. That officer later was reinstated by an arbitrator.
“It gave us the appearance in the public that our officers are above the law,” Mitchell said.
Under the proposed changes, the Criminal Justice Training Commission could revoke officers’ certification if they’re convicted of some felony and gross misdemeanor crimes, or if they’re untruthful about a material fact. The proposal is from the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs.
Organizations that represent rank-and-file law enforcement officers testified against the bill, saying the new rules could circumvent the existing arbitration process. Some emphasized that officers don’t want to work with those who lack integrity or commit crimes but that existing statutes deal with officer misconduct.
Geoff Simpson, representing the Washington State Council of Fire Fighters, said a delicate balance exists between management and labor rights. He argued the proposed law would unnecessarily tip the scales toward management power.
“I don’t believe this bill is necessary,” said Simpson, whose organization also represents some commissioned officers. “The system is not broken.”
The measure is sponsored by two Republicans and two Democrats on the Senate Committee on Law & Justice. The panel did not vote on the measure Friday.
Story tags » Police

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus
digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.

HeraldNet highlights

A garden of ideas
A garden of ideas: Find a wealth of inspiration on Snohomish tour
'Everything fit perfectly'
'Everything fit perfectly': Lake Stevens QB explains why he committed to Georgia
A parking battleground
A parking battleground: Crowds flock to Lighthouse Park for beaches, farmers market
Summer on a plate
Summer on a plate: Many ways to enjoy melon, season's happiest fruit