Lawmakers began considering a bill Friday that would give a state commission more power to decertify officers.
Washougal Police Chief Ron Mitchell testified in favor of the proposal, describing how one of his officers was fired and then convicted of assaulting a man who was restrained in the back of his patrol car. That officer later was reinstated by an arbitrator.
“It gave us the appearance in the public that our officers are above the law,” Mitchell said.
Under the proposed changes, the Criminal Justice Training Commission could revoke officers’ certification if they’re convicted of some felony and gross misdemeanor crimes, or if they’re untruthful about a material fact. The proposal is from the Washington Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs.
Organizations that represent rank-and-file law enforcement officers testified against the bill, saying the new rules could circumvent the existing arbitration process. Some emphasized that officers don’t want to work with those who lack integrity or commit crimes but that existing statutes deal with officer misconduct.
Geoff Simpson, representing the Washington State Council of Fire Fighters, said a delicate balance exists between management and labor rights. He argued the proposed law would unnecessarily tip the scales toward management power.
“I don’t believe this bill is necessary,” said Simpson, whose organization also represents some commissioned officers. “The system is not broken.”
The measure is sponsored by two Republicans and two Democrats on the Senate Committee on Law & Justice. The panel did not vote on the measure Friday.
More Northwest Headlines
Thousands in Mount Vernon mourn state trooper who died on duty Maryland musician convicted of wire fraud in Montana BNSF Railway fined for treated railroad ties in water Wildfire continues to grow along Lake Chelan $1 million bail for woman charged with killing husband, toddler son Tanker planes help crews battle brush fire near Spokane Man killed, suspect caught after high-speed chase in Puyallup Federal appeals court hears arguments on polar bear habitat
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.