Win tickets to Evergreen State Fair concert
The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

‘A Field in England’ arresting, druggy, mystifying

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
By Robert Horton
Herald Movie Critic
@citizenhorton
Published:
Anyone innocently wandering into “A Field in England” can be forgiven for thinking they’ve stepped through a time portal to the late 1960s.
Along with its arty approach and unexplained allegorical premise, the movie explodes into full-on psychedelia after a certain stage — all the weirder for being in black-and-white.
One wants to summon up a few reference points, but even this is challenging: The movie’s a little “Waiting for Godot,” and a little “Magical Mystery Tour,” with Vincent Price’s character from “Witchfinder General” hanging around. We should invoke Monty Python, too, for the film’s grubbiness and catch-all social criticism. (Had they been younger, the surviving Pythons might’ve made a fine cast for this.)
The actual setting has nothing to do with Swinging London; the film’s summary says it is set in the mid-17th century, so that’s what we’ll go with. All of the action takes place in featureless fields, where a small group of soldiers trudge together after fleeing a battle.
The most talkative of them, Whitehead (Reece Shearsmith), is actually no soldier, but a scholarly servant out doing the bidding of his unseen “master.”
He and his filthy fellow deserters fall under the sway of an Irishman named O’Neil (Michael Smiley), who claims to be an alchemist and says that if they begin digging holes in the field they will find gold. This goal, clearly absurd, is enough to define this temporary five-man social experiment.
Director Ben Wheatley (“Sightseers”), working with screenwriter and frequent collaborator Amy Jump, creates a distinctive world, that’s certain. Like many British artists, Wheatley is obsessed with the subject of Englishness, and he leaves no class or type unscathed.
So the movie probably has more sock for UK viewers, to say nothing of the fact — for this hearing-impaired Yankee, at least — that maybe a third of the dialogue is unintelligible. (At least the trippiest stroboscopic parts, however migraine-inducing, are without dialogue.)
Speaking of the psychedelics, it’s typical of this film’s puzzling storytelling that we can’t be quite sure when things go off the even keel. The fellows ingest their first stewed mushrooms fairly early on, which could explain the curious arrival of O’Neil (tied up at the end of a thick rope attached to a tribal-looking post?) and other such happenings.
The maddening thing is, for all the film’s doodling, occasional moments are genuinely funny or haunting. Whitehead’s slow-motion stumble out of O’Neil’s pitched tent, where something unspeakable has just happened, is “A Field in England” at its best: arresting, druggy and mystifying.
“A Field in England” (2 1/2 stars)
A very arty, occasionally psychedelic black-and-white film about a group of 17th century soldiers who find themselves wandering aimlessly after a battle. Director Ben Wheatley creates some haunting moments along the way — it’s like watching Monty Python tackle “Waiting for Godot” — but it’s definitely an uphill slog.
Rated: Not rated; probably R for violence, language.
Showing: SIFF Film Center.
Story tags » Movies

More Entertainment Headlines

NEWSLETTER

Weekend to-do list

Our to-do list full of ideas for your weekend

Calendar

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus