David Gower was convicted in 2009 of incest and indecent liberties after a judge heard testimony from the girl as well as from another relative, whom Gower was previously convicted of molesting.
Typically, any evidence that’s intended to show that a person is likely to commit a crime is not allowed at trial — instead, courts focus on whether the crime actually occurred. However, from 2008 until it was struck down as unconstitutional in 2012, Washington had a law that said such evidence could be allowed in sex offense cases.
It was under that law that the testimony from the other relative was admitted at his trial. In a 6-3 opinion Thursday, the court said that testimony should not have been considered. The minority agreed that it should not have been considered, but they said a new trial was not warranted because there was enough other evidence to convict him.
More Northwest Headlines
Evacuation order lifted for town of Roosevelt 3:14 p.m. Cattle becomes Oregon’s top agricultural commodity 2:12 p.m. Yakima guaranteed at least 1 Latino council member 2:12 p.m. Christian school in Oregon sued over firing pregnant, unwed educator 1:54 p.m. Family of man who died in Spokane jail files claim seeking at least $6.5M 1:40 p.m. Federal charge filed in Seattle hate crime 12:10 p.m. State Board of Education to set bar for Common Core tests 12:04 p.m. Northern Idaho man pleads not guilty to 3 murder counts 12:02 p.m.
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.