The Herald of Everett, Washington
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up | Manage  Green editions icon Green editions


HeraldNet Headlines
HeraldNet Newsletter Delivered to your inbox each week.
Published: Thursday, June 5, 2014, 12:01 a.m.
Urban trees

County proposal doesn’t protect environment

Thank you to the Herald for allowing both sides of an important environmental issue — how we will keep trees in our urban areas. (Commentaries on May 24 and May 31).
Futurewise and Pilchuck Audubon Society have been involved with this issue since the first tree replacement codes were adopted in 2009. Like many of you, we want livable, sustainable communities that include affordable housing, open space and clean water.
Large trees can help bring a sense of place and tranquility to our busy lives, not to mention help keep our air and water clean. As pointed out in the commentary on May 31, our large trees protect our soil stability, clean our air, provide noise reduction, help reduce climate impacts, and take up huge amounts of water that otherwise runoff with pollutants to our streams, rivers and Puget Sound.
With good policies and regulations, we know it's possible for our region to grow while protecting our environment.
Unfortunately, the current tree proposal under consideration by the county fails to adequately protect our environment. Under the proposal, properties can be clear-cut provided they are replaced with six-foot saplings, which everyone hopes will provide for a 30 percent tree canopy in 20 or 30 years. But there's no guarantee the replacement trees will survive and the little incentive the county offers to retain existing significant trees in new residential developments will allow for reducing the future 30 percent tree canopy by up to 250 percent!
We believe this is the wrong approach.
Instead of continuing to allow for clear cutting, grading off our precious top soil, building homes, and then replanting—which won't include any monitoring or enforcement—we need a process that allows for our healthiest, strongest, and most significant stands of trees to be retained for future generations.
One of the reasons people want to live in Snohomish County is its natural beauty. Our elected officials shouldn't fall into the false choice that protecting the environment hurts our economy. Otherwise we'll have lots of new, empty homes and buildings.
Please stand with us as we stand up for the trees. Our remaining undeveloped land needs significant tree retention.
Kristin Kelly
Snohomish/Skagit Program Director, Futurewise, Smart Growth Director, Pilchuck Audubon Society, Snohomish

digital subscription promo

Subscribe now

Unlimited digital access starting at 99 cents, or included with any print subscription.


Herald Editorial Board

Jon Bauer, Opinion Editor:

Carol MacPherson, Editorial Writer:

Neal Pattison, Executive Editor:

Josh O'Connor, Publisher:

Have your say

Feel strongly about something? Share it with the community by writing a letter to the editor. Send letters by e-mail to, by fax to 425-339-3458 or mail to The Herald - Letters, P.O. Box 930, Everett, WA 98206. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. (We'll only publish your name and hometown.) We reserve the right to edit letters, but if you keep yours to 250 words or less, we won’t ask you to shorten it. If your letter is published, please wait 30 days before submitting another. Have a question about letters? Contact Carol MacPherson at or 425-339-3472.

HeraldNet highlights

Wolf population growing
Wolf population growing: Chief concern about more wolves: Livestock attacks
Richard Sherman 2.0
Richard Sherman 2.0: Seahawks' star cornerback is equally effective with less bravado
Playing with all they have
Playing with all they have: Highland Christian girls compete, inspire with just 5 players
$800K in scholarships, so far
$800K in scholarships, so far: Monroe High's Chloe Cook expects she’ll still need a job