On Thursday, justices said they want lawmakers to explain why they shouldn’t be held in contempt for not enacting a schedule for fully funding Washington’s schools as the court directed them to do.
The court scheduled a show-cause hearing Sept. 3.
All of this dates back to the 2012 decision in the McCleary case. The court ruled then that the state had failed to meet its constitutional duty to pay the full cost of a basic education for the roughly 1 million students in public elementary and secondary schools.
That decision gave lawmakers until the 2017-18 school year to comply. Then in January the court told lawmakers to produce a progress report by April that included a timeline for completing the task. Lawmakers reported they tried but could not reach agreement on a timeline.
Here are some actions the court said it might take if it finds lawmakers in contempt:
-Impose monetary sanctions;
-Prohibit spending on non-education services and programs “until the Court’s constitutional ruling is complied with”;
-Order the Legislature to fund specific amounts for education programs;
-Invalidate school funding cuts
-Prohibit any funding "of an unconstitutional education system."
Most recent The Petri Dish posts
- Murray backs Iran nuclear agreement Aug. 25
- The issue of ‘failing’ schools slips under the radar Aug. 20
- Inslee offers 'guidance' on carbon emissions cap, desires adoption in a year Aug. 14
- There’s no ignoring the chatter around county executive race Aug. 13
- Democrats block attempt to hold earlier presidential primary Aug. 11
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.