The high court ruled in 2009 that Wal-Mart was entitled to close the store in Jonquiere in 2005, seven months after workers voted to unionize. But the workers filed a new case that said Wal-Mart contravened a section of Quebec labor law, which says working conditions must not be altered in any way, shape or form during a unionization process.
The court ruled in a five-to-two decision Friday that the world's largest retailer modified working conditions for the employees without a valid reason when it shut down.
An arbiter will determine appropriate reparations, possibly with damages and interest.
MORE HBJ HEADLINES
LED lightbulb savings outshine solar and wind power It's the golden age of the American muscle car Ford headlight failures prompting wrecks draw U.S. probe Volkswagen recalls 420,000 vehicles for air bag issue Former Pillsbury executives plan to relaunch RyKrisp J.C. Penney narrows loss, tops expectations
Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.