The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

Holder grows in the job

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
By David Ignatius
Published:
WASHINGTON — Setting clear management guidelines may be the least glamorous part of being a Cabinet secretary, but by this measure, Attorney General Eric Holder has succeeded over the past year in communicating his law-enforcement priorities to the Justice Department.
When I queried a range of Washington attorneys about Holder's record for a June 2013 column, I found considerable criticism. Some questioned his supervision of major cases. Others faulted what they said was a failure to shape legal policy. Holder's supporters countered at the time that the criticism was unfair, and that the attorney general was setting an agenda internally that would become clearer to the outside world.
A year later, a sharper focus at Justice has indeed been noted by many outside observers, including some who were critical of Holder before. “Being attorney general is about setting priorities, and Holder has done that during the second term,” says one prominent Washington lawyer who was earlier a skeptic.
“Holder deserves more credit than his critics give him,” says John Bellinger, who served as State Department legal adviser during the George W. Bush administration. “He's launched some important domestic justice initiatives and has directed a series of successful terrorism prosecutions.”
One Holder priority has been a “Smart on Crime” initiative to adjust the government's approach to drug offenses and other nonviolent crimes. A U.S. attorney in Washington in the 1980s during the “War on Drugs,” with its harsh mandatory sentences, Holder saw that “the future was being thrown away” by imprisoning minorities and low-income people disproportionately, says a colleague.
Holder decided it was time to reverse this injustice. He sent a memo to the White House in 2012 that noted: “The War on Drugs ... is not without certain successes. We have, however, expended substantial resources, incarcerated huge numbers of Americans and caused unexpected negative collateral impacts.” He told the White House he planned to examine Justice's strategies and, where appropriate, “make necessary adjustments.”
The crime initiatives were rolled out last August, in some cases tracking a parallel effort by the U.S. Sentencing Commission. To prepare the way, Holder spoke last fall with DEA agents and in March with U.S. attorneys. In addition to changing sentencing recommendations, Justice pushed for new probation, clemency and re-entry programs to help ex-convicts rejoin their communities.
“This administration has made it a priority to promote effective policies to aid former prisoners in re-entering society,” Holder wrote in August. He's held monthly meetings to follow up. Holder has been similarly focused in trying to enforce parts of the Voting Rights Act, despite a Supreme Court ruling last year that voided a key section.
The Justice Department is one of those huge federal bureaucracies that sometimes defy supervision, so Holder was challenged by implementation of the Supreme Court's 2013 decision in the Windsor case, striking down portions of the Defense of Marriage Act. Holder created a task force in the civil division to work with other federal agencies. He reported to President Obama on June 20 that after retooling over 1,000 laws and rules, “agencies across the federal government have implemented the Windsor decision to treat married same-sex couples the same as married opposite-sex couples for the benefits and obligations for which marriage is relevant.” This was the kind of policy coordination some observers had earlier found lacking.
Holder has steered a steadier course in prosecuting terrorism cases. Critics complained about a 2011 reversal under pressure of an initial decision to prosecute Khalid Sheik Mohammed in a civilian court in New York. But Holder stuck to his guns. Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, Osama bin Laden's son-in-law, was convicted by a federal jury last March. Ahmed Abu Khattala was indicted in Washington for the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi.
Justice has won some astronomical settlements in financial crime cases. BNP Paribas agreed Monday to pay $8.9 billion after pleading guilty to money laundering charges. Credit Suisse in May paid $2.6 billion to settle a criminal case. JPMorgan agreed to an eye-popping $13 billion settlement. But some critics complain these cases are more impressive as PR victories than as systematic prosecutions of fraud.
Some observers expected that Holder would leave Justice after the 2012 election. By staying longer, he has put his stamp more firmly on an unwieldy agency and established clear policies in areas that mattered to him. Attorneys who ask what the Holder era accomplished now have a better answer.
David Ignatius is a Washington Post columnist. His email address is davidignatius@washpost.com.

More Opinion Columnists Headlines

NEWSLETTER

HeraldNet Headlines

Top stories and breaking news updates

Calendar

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus