Like The Herald Business Journal on Facebook!
The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
Heraldnet.com

The top local business stories in your email

Contact Us:

Josh O'Connor
Publisher
Phone: 425-339-3007
joconnor@heraldnet.com

Maureen Bozlinski
General Sales Manager
Phone: 425-339-3445
Fax: 425-339-3049
mbozlinksi@heraldnet.com

Jim Davis
Editor
Phone: 425-339-3097
jdavis@heraldnet.com

Site address:
1800 41st Street, S-300,
Everett, WA 98203

Mailing address:
P.O. Box 930
Everett, WA 98206

HBJ RSS feeds

Judge reinstates $1.5M unshuffled cards lawsuit

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
Associated Press
Published:
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. ó A case pitting a casino against gamblers who won $1.5 million in a game with unshuffled card decks may be heading toward trial.
In April 2012, 14 mini-baccarat players racked up the winnings over 41 straight hands when they realized the cards hadnít been shuffled and were coming out in a specific pattern. Many of them quickly upped their bets from $10 a hand to $5,000.
The Golden Nugget casino doesnít want to pay them, and it wants to collect more than $500,000 it already paid.
In June, Atlantic County Superior Court Judge James Isman ruled that the game was illegal under state casino regulations and said the casino didnít have to pay.
Isman recently retired, and on July 25 a different judge granted a motion to reconsider the decision. Judge Allen Littlefield said that the gamblers can continue the discovery process and argue their case at trial this fall.
Lawyers for the casino said that it is shocked that Ismanís rulings were overturned and will appeal.
Mark Pfeffer, who represents defendant Nguyen Le, said that itís up to state gambling regulators to rule on whether the game is legal. Gambling regulators are among the possible witnesses who would be deposed before trial.
The casino sued the 14 gamblers for the return of money paid out and seeking to be absolved of having to redeem the outstanding chips.
A preliminary court ruling two years ago went against the casino, which said it would appeal. Hours later, the casinoís owner overrode his lawyers and said it would pay the remainder of the disputed winnings. But that deal fell apart days later when some of the gamblers refused to dismiss their own claims against the Golden Nugget.
Story tags » Gambling

MORE HBJ HEADLINES

CALENDAR

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus

Market roundup