The Herald of Everett, Washington
Customer service  |  Subscribe   |   Log in or sign up   |   Advertising information   |   Contact us
HeraldNet on Facebook HeraldNet on Twitter HeraldNet RSS feeds HeraldNet Pinterest HeraldNet Google Plus HeraldNet Youtube
HeraldNet Newsletters  Newsletters: Sign up  Green editions icon Green editions

Lawyer asks high court to deny 120-day delay in releasing mentally ill

SHARE: facebook Twitter icon Linkedin icon Google+ icon Email icon |  PRINTER-FRIENDLY  |  COMMENTS
By Martha Bellisle
Associated Press
Published:
SEATTLE — A lawyer representing mentally ill patients who were “warehoused” in emergency rooms because no treatment beds were available urged the state Supreme Court on Friday to reject the state’s request for a delay on banning the practice of psychiatric boarding.
Jennifer Sweigert argued that what the state really wants is “permission to continue violating the law and the civil liberties of persons with mental illness for 90 to 120 more days.”
Gov. Jay Inslee spokeswoman Jaime Smith responded to Sweigert’s claims by saying in an email: “Our interest is in trying to preserve services for patients and our request was strongly supported by many of the organizations who serve those patients.”
The court ruled on Aug. 7 that boarding people held under the Involuntary Treatment Act in emergency rooms because of overcrowding in treatment centers is not allowed. The act permits detention of people who are a threat to themselves or others “for the purpose of providing mental health treatment.” The extent of the problem is not known because no one collects data on how many patients are held this way.
After the high court set a deadline for the state to stop the practice, Attorney General Robert Ferguson filed a motion requesting a stay on the order so they could set up 145 more treatment beds. He argued that without a stay, people would be released without treatment and public safety could be threatened.
The court is set to consider both sides next Thursday.
Sweigert said she first challenged the practice in early 2013, and a judge ruled in May 2013 that the law did not allow the state to hold people in hospitals for non-medical reasons. That ruling was entered on June 10, 2013, she said. Fourteen months later, the high court affirmed the order and now the state wants more time, she said. That request should be denied, she said.
“If this court’s opinion were a complete surprise, a stay might be reasonable,” she said. “In light of the above history, it is not.”
Essentially, the state is saying, Sweigert said, “it is better for people to be deprived of their civil liberties and detained in hospital emergency rooms without treatment than to be released.
“But that judgment call,” she said, “is precisely the one the state is not permitted to make.”
Story tags » State Supreme CourtMental health

More Local News Headlines

NEWSLETTER

HeraldNet Headlines

Top stories and breaking news updates

Calendar

Share your comments: Log in using your HeraldNet account or your Facebook, Twitter or Disqus profile. Comments that violate the rules are subject to removal. Please see our terms of use. Please note that you must verify your email address for your comments to appear.

You are logged in using your HeraldNet ID. Click here to update your profile. | Log out.

Our new comment system is not supported in IE 7. Please upgrade your browser here.

comments powered by Disqus