Supreme Court to hear battle over Confederate licenses plates

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices often feel that their colleagues have stumbled to the right outcome in a case, even though they took the wrong path to get there. When that happens, a justice will write a concurring opinion, pointing out what he or she thinks is the correct legal reasoning.

That’s what Justice David H. Souter did in 2009, his last year on the court. It was a tricky First Amendment case involving a little-known religion called Summum, which wanted to place a monument displaying its Seven Aphorisms next to The Ten Commandments and other monuments in a public park in Pleasant Grove, Utah.

In a splintered and somewhat complicated opinion, the court ruled against Summum. It pointed out reasons why the monuments in the park should be seen as speech by the government, not by private individuals, and thus said the city was free to accept some and reject others.

Souter agreed with the outcome in the particular case, but was nervous about going too far. He proposed a simpler rule: asking “whether a reasonable and fully informed observer would understand the expression to be government speech.”

Souter’s concurrence was what is sometimes called a “lone ranger”—no other justice signed on to it. But it is at the heart of another First Amendment challenge the Supreme Court will consider Monday about the free speech rights of those who want special messages on their government-issued license plates.

The case comes from Texas, where the Department of Motor Vehicles Board turned down a request for a specialized plate from the Sons of Confederate Veterans, whose insignia contains the Confederate battle flag. The Texas board members have authorized hundreds of special requests — a Texan can celebrate “Dr Pepper” on his license plate — but rejected this one after receiving tens of thousands of comments about the design, most of them negative.

But a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit employed Souter’s test to decide the board was wrong. A reasonable observer would conclude that the driver of the vehicle, not the state of Texas, was the speaker honoring the Civil War dead, the panel decided.

And it said the board members had engaged in viewpoint discrimination by adopting the negative view of the Confederate flag as a symbol of racism and slavery rather than the organization’s view it was simply honoring ancestors who had fought bravely in a lost cause.

Specialized license plates have bedeviled lower courts for years, as states seeking the additional revenue the plates bring have struggled over whether to allow messages with which not everyone agrees.

Most of the legal battles have been over abortion, as “pro-choice” and “choose life” forces seek a spot on the tags. But the Richmond-based Sons of Confederate Veterans has been litigious as well.

Both Virginia and Maryland are under court order to issue the plates. Befitting its border state status, Maryland has sold only 409 vehicle plates and 61 motorcycle plates since it started offering them in 1995 — it was a plan to recall the plates that got the state in trouble with federal courts.

Virginia did not want to allow the organization’s logo on the plates, but lost that battle at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in 2002. As of last month, 1,343 vehicle tags and 259 motorcycle plates had been registered.

So a “reasonable and fully informed observer” stuck in traffic behind such a plate would have the opportunity to decide whether what she is seeing is a government endorsement or the driver’s message.

In its brief to the court, Texas insists that “the speech that appears on state-issued license plates is government speech” and all agree that the Constitution “allows a state to select the messages, symbols, and viewpoints that it is willing to publicly support.”

It adds: “Texas is not willing to propagate the Confederate battle flag by etching that image onto state-issued license plates that bear the state’s name.” The lesson of the Summum decision was about the government’s rights, Texas said, not Souter’s lone concurrence.

Most observers believe that the Supreme Court must find that license plates are government speech for the state to have a chance. But Texas argues that even if the messages are seen as private speech, the state has not engaged in viewpoint discrimination.

Texas hasn’t taken sides on the matter of the Confederate flag and besides, governments are not required to adopt messages with which it disagrees.

“The District of Columbia’s license plates include the phrase “Taxation Without Representation”; the Speech Clause does not require the district to begin offering license plates with messages that praise the district’s lack of voting representation in Congress,” Texas argues.

But the veterans argue that it could not be more clear that it is the driver that has picked one of the more than 350 messages that Texas offers.

“No speech would occur but for a private individual, non-profit, or business designing the message and the driver attaching his or her chosen plate to the bumper and exiting his or her driveway,” the organization argues.

It says the board simply buckled under pressure and that the Texas code that allows it to “refuse to create a new specialty license plate if the design might be offensive to any member of the public” is far too broad.

Besides, the organization says, Texas is probably the last place in the country that should be squeamish about displaying the Rebel flag.

Jan. 19 is an official state holiday: Confederate Heroes Day. There are numerous monuments to Confederate figures in the state capitol, the challengers contend, and the battle flag that Texas so fears etching on license plates is on sale at the capitol gift shop.

“The state apparently does not believe that the ‘message’ of the Confederate flag is offensive to the public, or, if it is offensive, the state certainly does not shy away from its expression because of such offense,” the group argues.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Local News

A firefighter stands in silence before a panel bearing the names of L. John Regelbrugge and Kris Regelbrugge during the ten-year remembrance of the Oso landslide on Friday, March 22, 2024, at the Oso Landslide Memorial in Oso, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
‘Flood of emotions’ as Oso Landslide Memorial opens on 10th anniversary

Friends, family and first responders held a moment of silence at 10:37 a.m. at the new 2-acre memorial off Highway 530.

Julie Petersen poses for a photo with images of her sister Christina Jefferds and Jefferds’ grand daughter Sanoah Violet Huestis next to a memorial for Sanoah at her home on March 20, 2024 in Arlington, Washington. Peterson wears her sister’s favorite color and one of her bangles. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
‘It just all came down’: An oral history of the Oso mudslide

Ten years later, The Daily Herald spoke with dozens of people — first responders, family, survivors — touched by the deadliest slide in U.S. history.

Victims of the Oso mudslide on March 22, 2014. (Courtesy photos)
Remembering the 43 lives lost in the Oso mudslide

The slide wiped out a neighborhood along Highway 530 in 2014. “Even though you feel like you’re alone in your grief, you’re really not.”

Director Lucia Schmit, right, and Deputy Director Dara Salmon inside the Snohomish County Department of Emergency Management on Friday, March 8, 2024, in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
How Oso slide changed local emergency response ‘on virtually every level’

“In a decade, we have just really, really advanced,” through hard-earned lessons applied to the pandemic, floods and opioids.

Ron and Gail Thompson at their home on Monday, March 4, 2024 in Oso, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
In shadow of scarred Oso hillside, mudslide’s wounds still feel fresh

Locals reflected on living with grief and finding meaning in the wake of a catastrophe “nothing like you can ever imagine” in 2014.

Everett mall renderings from Brixton Capital. (Photo provided by the City of Everett)
Topgolf at the Everett Mall? Mayor’s hint still unconfirmed

After Cassie Franklin’s annual address, rumors circled about what “top” entertainment tenant could be landing at Everett Mall.

Everett
Everett man sentenced to 3 years of probation for mutilating animals

In 2022, neighbors reported Blayne Perez, 35, was shooting and torturing wildlife in north Everett.

Dorothy Crossman rides up on her bike to turn in her ballot  on Tuesday, Aug. 1, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Everett leaders plan to ask voters for property tax increase

City officials will spend weeks hammering out details of a ballot measure, as Everett faces a $12.6 million deficit.

Starbucks employee Zach Gabelein outside of the Mill Creek location where he works on Friday, Feb. 23, 2024 in Mill Creek, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Mill Creek Starbucks votes 21-1 to form union

“We obviously are kind of on the high of that win,” store bargaining delegate Zach Gabelein said.

Lynnwood police respond to a collision on highway 99 at 176 street SW. (Photo provided by Lynnwood Police)
Police: Teen in stolen car flees cops, causes crash in Lynnwood

The crash blocked traffic for over an hour at 176th Street SW. The boy, 16, was arrested on felony warrants.

The view of Mountain Loop Mine out the window of a second floor classroom at Fairmount Elementary on Wednesday, Jan. 10, 2024 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
County: Everett mining yard violated order to halt work next to school

At least 10 reports accused OMA Construction of violating a stop-work order next to Fairmount Elementary. A judge will hear the case.

Imagine Children's Museum's incoming CEO, Elizabeth "Elee" Wood. (Photo provided by Imagine Children's Museum)
Imagine Children’s Museum in Everett to welcome new CEO

Nancy Johnson, who has led Imagine Children’s Museum in Everett for 25 years, will retire in June.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.