Community Transit should lower costs, not increase tax

Snohomish County and Community Transit officials have announced they want more tax authority from the Legislature to pay for more passenger train and bus service.

The new taxes they have in mind would increase the tax burden on working families and hit most Snohomish County residents especially hard. Most county residents already pay a 0.9 percent sales tax and a 0.3 percent Motor Vehicle Excise Tax, the tax based on the state’s estimate of your car’s value, to Sound Transit.

In addition, Snohomish County residents outside of Everett currently pay a 0.9 percent sales tax to Community Transit for local and commuter bus service.

Next year, Sound Transit officials want to raise the sales tax they collect from 0.9 percent to 1.4 percent to fund more passenger rail and buses within their tax district. They also want to raise the unpopular car value tax rate from 0.3 percent to 1.1 percent of a vehicle’s value (or $110 annually on a $10,000 vehicle) and increase the property tax burden on households.

Community Transit officials also say they want the ability to increase their share of the sales tax rate from 0.9 percent to 1.2 percent to pay for more buses. Both tax-increase proposals would go to a public vote.

New taxes don’t seem justified, in light of good news from Snohomish County’s transit agency. Community Transit officials are adding bus service without raising regressive taxes on working families. They plan to increase bus service by 17 percent this June, due to a rebounding economy and a recent windfall in sales tax revenues.

What Community Transit officials haven’t announced, however, is the embarrassingly high cost of running their agency compared to other transit systems in the state.

According to the state Department of Transportation, Community Transit is one of the most expensive transit agencies in the state for its size. It costs a whopping $9.10 per passenger trip on a typical Community Transit bus. Although the adult fare to ride the bus is $2, bus fares on average only cover $1.40 of each trip. Taxpayers subsidize the other $7.70.

Spokane’s transit agency serves about the same-size area as Community Transit, but with half the population. Yet even with fewer potential customers, Spokane Transit carries more people than Community Transit at a lower cost. Spokane Transit’s cost to move a passenger is just $3.98 per trip on local bus routes, less than half of Community Transit’s. In 2013, Spokane Transit provided the public 11.1 million bus trips for $44 million, compared to Community Transit’s 5.3 million trips for $48 million.

Snohomish County taxpayers also pay more to receive less. Spokane Transit provided 383,000 hours of local bus service last year — Community Transit provided 100,000 fewer hours, but spent $4 million more.

Another similar agency, Clark County’s C-TRAN, provided about the same number of trips as Community Transit in 2013 (5.4 million) for half of the cost, $26 million.

Costs at King County Metro, the largest county bus system in the state, are only $4.41 per trip, and Pierce Transit spends about $4.75 per trip.

Community Transit has already maxed out its taxing authority, imposing the highest sales tax they can under state law. Before transit officials lobby Olympia for more power to raise taxes, they should work to reduce the cost of providing bus service. The county’s transit agency is currently adding service, which is a good thing, but it could expand service even more with better budget management instead of raising regressive taxes.

Bob Pishue is director of Washington Policy Center’s Coles Center for Transportation.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Carson gets a chance to sound the horn in an Everett Fire Department engine with the help of captain Jason Brock during a surprise Make-A-Wish sendoff Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023, at Thornton A. Sullivan Park in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett voters will set course for city finances

This fall and in coming years, they will be asked how to fund and support the services they use.

Devotees of TikTok, Mona Swain, center, and her sister, Rachel Swain, right, both of Atlanta, monitor voting at the Capitol in Washington, as the House passed a bill that would lead to a nationwide ban of the popular video app if its China-based owner doesn't sell, Wednesday, March 13, 2024. Lawmakers contend the app's owner, ByteDance, is beholden to the Chinese government, which could demand access to the data of TikTok's consumers in the U.S. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Editorial: Forced sale of TikTok ignores network of problems

The removal of a Chinese company would still leave concerns for data privacy and the content on apps.

Rep. Strom Peterson, D-Edmonds, watches the State of the State speech by Gov. Jay Inslee on the second day of the legislative session at the Washington state Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, in Olympia, Wash. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)
Editorial: Legislature has its own production of ‘The Holdovers’

What state lawmakers left behind in good ideas that should get more attention and passage next year.

Comment: Measles outbreaks show importance of MMR vaccinations

The highly contagious disease requires a 95 percent vaccination rate to limit the spread of outbreaks.

Harrop: Should ‘affordable’ come at cost of quality of living?

As states push their cities to ignore zoning rules, the YIMBYs are covering for developers.

Saunders: Classified document cases show degrees of guilt

President Biden’s age might protect him, but the special prosecutor didn’t exonerate him either.

Comment: Clearing the internet of misinformation, deep fakes

With social networks’ spotty moderation record, users need to identify and call out problems they see.

Eco-Nomics: Price of gas, fossil fuels higher than you think

Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels force unseen costs in climate disasters, illness and more.

Vote against I-2117 to keep best tool to protect climate

We voters will be offered the opportunity to repeal Washington state’s Climate… Continue reading

Lack of maternal health care raises risks of deadly sepsis

In today’s contentious climate, we often hear political debates about maternal health… Continue reading

Trump’s stance on abortion isn’t moderate; it’s dangerous

Voters deserve to know the facts and the truth about what will… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.