Rein in unregulated drones

Duck! The drones, it is quite clear, are out of the barn. And true to the idiom, Congress is belatedly trying to close the door.

From the White House to quite possibly your house, dozens and dozens of reports of dangerous drone incidents are piling up. Among the scarier examples: On Aug. 9, pilots on four airliners spotted an unmanned craft as they approached Newark Liberty International Airport, Bloomberg News reported. Additionally, the Federal Aviation Administration in recent weeks received dozens of reports about drones too close to aircraft fighting California wildfires and near-collisions over airports in New York, Minneapolis and Austin, Texas.

Flying a drone near an airliner, or the White House for that matter, is what we expect of terrorists. But so far, the drone craziness can be traced to “hobbyists” or “recreationists.”

“Without common sense rules, I believe it’s only a matter of time before there’s a tragic accident,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California. She and other lawmakers want regulators to revise existing law to plug a loophole that spares recreational drones from regulations, Bloomberg reported. They are also are seeking the use of software that would prevent drones from flying in prohibited areas.

Currently, drone operators fall under voluntary education campaign run by the drone industry and the FAA. Which obviously isn’t working. (While sales of drones continue to soar.)

Other examples documented by The Washington Post: A drone used to smuggle drugs into an Ohio prison; a drone smashed against a Cincinnati skyscraper; a runaway two-pound drone struck a woman at a gay pride parade in Seattle, knocking her unconscious; a drone buzzed into a crowd at an outdoor festival in Albuquerque,, injuring a bystander; in Tampa, a drone reportedly stalked a woman outside a downtown bar before crashing into her car; and a Connecticut man posted an Internet video of a drone he had armed with a handgun, firing shots by remote control. Local police and the FAA determined that no laws had been broken.

On the other hand, it is against the law to shoot a drone, even when it hovers over your private property, as more than one person has discovered. (Although firefighters were definitely within their rights when they tried to drown a drone flying over a house fire.)

The Department of Homeland Security said it had recorded more than 500 incidents since 2012 in which rogue drones hovered over “sensitive sites and critical installations,” such as military bases and nuclear plants, The Post reported.

Meanwhile, scientists are concerned drones are stressing out wildlife. Just as they are stressing out and/or endangering humans. Yes, Congress, better late than never, bring on the common sense drone laws.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, April 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Snow dusts the treeline near Heather Lake Trailhead in the area of a disputed logging project on Tuesday, April 11, 2023, outside Verlot, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Move ahead with state forests’ carbon credit sales

A judge clears a state program to set aside forestland and sell carbon credits for climate efforts.

State needs to assure better rail service for Amtrak Cascades

The Puget Sound region’s population is expected to grow by 4 million… Continue reading

Trump’s own words contradict claims of Christian faith

In a recent letter to the editor regarding Christians and Donald Trump,… Continue reading

Comment: Israel should choose reasoning over posturing

It will do as it determines, but retaliation against Iran bears the consequences of further exchanges.

Comment: Ths slow but sure progress of Brown v. Board

Segregation in education remains, as does racism, but the case is a milestone of the 20th century.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, April 17

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A new apple variety, WA 64, has been developed by WSU's College of Agricultural, Human and Natural Resource Sciences. The college is taking suggestions on what to name the variety. (WSU)
Editorial: Apple-naming contest fun celebration of state icon

A new variety developed at WSU needs a name. But take a pass on suggesting Crispy McPinkface.

Apply ‘Kayden’s Law’ in Washington’s family courts

Next session, our state Legislature must pass legislation that clarifies how family… Continue reading

What religious icons will Trump sell next?

My word! So now Donald Trump is in the business of selling… Continue reading

Commen: ‘Civil War’ movie could prompt some civil discourse

The dystopian movie serves to warn against division and for finding common ground in our concerns.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.