Viewpoints: Quantifying the risk that bacon will kill you

You have of course heard the sad news about bacon. As the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer put it Monday in a news release:

“The experts concluded that each 50 gram portion of processed meat eaten daily increases the risk of colorectal cancer by 18 percent.”

How much is 50 grams of processed meat? In bacon terms it’s about two slices. Just to be clear, it isn’t that eating two pieces of bacon will increase your colorectal cancer risk by 18 percent. It’s that eating two pieces of bacon every day for the rest of your life will.

But here’s the important question that isn’t directly addressed in the pages and pages of information released Monday by the IARC or in any of the subsequent news coverage that I read: What’s the risk of colorectal cancer to begin with?

To illustrate how much this can matter: In 1995, the U.K.’s Committee on Safety in Medicines issued a warning that third-generation oral contraceptive pills increased the risk of thrombosis by 100 percent. What that meant was that the risk of getting thrombosis — potentially life-threatening blood clots in the legs or lungs — went from 1 in 7,000 for women taking second-generation birth control pills to 2 in 7,000 for those taking the third-generation variety.

Not a huge risk, then. But a 100 percent risk increase sounds quite ominous. As psychologist Gerd Gigerenzer describes in his book “Risk Savvy,” the warning scared many women away from the pill. One result was an estimated 13,000 additional abortions the following year in England and Wales. Another was, ironically, a lot of thrombosis cases — pregnancies and abortions are much more likely to bring on the condition than does taking a third-generation birth control pill.

Information about relative risk can be misleading, then, unless it’s presented in the context of absolute risk. So what’s the absolute risk of getting colorectal cancer? To sum up tables from the National Cancer Institute, men 60 and younger face an almost 5 percent chance of getting colorectal cancer in their lifetimes, and a greater than 2 percent chance of dying from it. For women it’s about 4.5 percent and 1.9 percent.

Colorectal cancer, then, is a relatively common and deadly disease. It tends to hit people later in life, when they’re eventually going to die of something in any case. But still, it’s worth trying to avoid. Let’s say you’re a man, you have about a 5 percent chance of eventually getting colorectal cancer, and you up your bacon consumption by two pieces a day. That increases your cancer risk to almost 6 percent — not a trivial jump.

Unlike the ill-advised and since-revoked U.S. dietary recommendations against cholesterol, these processed-meat cancer-risk estimates are based on years and years of empirical research. The 18 percent figure comes from a 2011 meta-analysis, published in the open-source journal PLOS One, of nine different studies of colorectal cancer.

It’s just an estimate, and it’s always possible that other things that processed-meat eaters tend to do — such as standing around grills full of burning charcoal — raise their cancer risk. Still, it wouldn’t be unreasonable to make changes in your diet based on this evidence (and similar but weaker evidence on the link between red meat and cancer). I like bacon a lot, but I’d rather have a 5 in 100 chance of getting colorectal cancer than a 6 in 100 chance. Good on the World Health Organization for getting the word out. What I don’t understand, though, is why they didn’t present the risks in those terms.

Justin Fox is a Bloomberg View columnist writing about business.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Carson gets a chance to sound the horn in an Everett Fire Department engine with the help of captain Jason Brock during a surprise Make-A-Wish sendoff Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023, at Thornton A. Sullivan Park in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett voters will set course for city finances

This fall and in coming years, they will be asked how to fund and support the services they use.

Devotees of TikTok, Mona Swain, center, and her sister, Rachel Swain, right, both of Atlanta, monitor voting at the Capitol in Washington, as the House passed a bill that would lead to a nationwide ban of the popular video app if its China-based owner doesn't sell, Wednesday, March 13, 2024. Lawmakers contend the app's owner, ByteDance, is beholden to the Chinese government, which could demand access to the data of TikTok's consumers in the U.S. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Editorial: Forced sale of TikTok ignores network of problems

The removal of a Chinese company would still leave concerns for data privacy and the content on apps.

Rep. Strom Peterson, D-Edmonds, watches the State of the State speech by Gov. Jay Inslee on the second day of the legislative session at the Washington state Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, in Olympia, Wash. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)
Editorial: Legislature has its own production of ‘The Holdovers’

What state lawmakers left behind in good ideas that should get more attention and passage next year.

Comment: Measles outbreaks show importance of MMR vaccinations

The highly contagious disease requires a 95 percent vaccination rate to limit the spread of outbreaks.

Harrop: Should ‘affordable’ come at cost of quality of living?

As states push their cities to ignore zoning rules, the YIMBYs are covering for developers.

Saunders: Classified document cases show degrees of guilt

President Biden’s age might protect him, but the special prosecutor didn’t exonerate him either.

Comment: Clearing the internet of misinformation, deep fakes

With social networks’ spotty moderation record, users need to identify and call out problems they see.

Eco-Nomics: Price of gas, fossil fuels higher than you think

Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels force unseen costs in climate disasters, illness and more.

Vote against I-2117 to keep best tool to protect climate

We voters will be offered the opportunity to repeal Washington state’s Climate… Continue reading

Lack of maternal health care raises risks of deadly sepsis

In today’s contentious climate, we often hear political debates about maternal health… Continue reading

Trump’s stance on abortion isn’t moderate; it’s dangerous

Voters deserve to know the facts and the truth about what will… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.