Pull plug on costly blimp

Long before the military’s blimp went AWOL last week, the aircraft, and its bloated program had been exposed as a $2.7 billion (and counting) failure. So entrenched is our military-industrial complex that such unkillable, ineffectual, money-sucking contracts have a name: Defense specialists call them “zombie” programs, the Los Angeles Times reported in September, in an exquisitely detailed investigation that shows the failed blimp-borne radar system lost its moorings long before it took off Wednesday on its little jaunt.

The 17-year-old program has faced criticism since the beginning, but it’s been no match for the lobbying done by Raytheon Co., the private company in charge of creating and running the Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor program, or JLENS, according to the Los Angeles Times.

The blimps are supposed to provide an early warning if the country were ever attacked with cruise missiles, drones or other low-flying weapons. The newspaper began its investigation after a “Florida postal worker flew a single-seat, rotary-wing aircraft into the heart of the nation’s capital to dramatize his demand for campaign finance reform” on April 15. Where was the blimp, where was the warning?

Turns out the system was “not operational” that day, as the head of the North American Aerospace Defense Command, Adm. William E. Gortney, told a congressional hearing soon after. He had no estimate of when the system might be operational.

The program’s failure has long been foreshadowed and documented: In 2012 and 2013, the Pentagon’s Operational Test and Evaluation Office said the blimps were not meeting operational goals, Fox News reported, and in one case charging that JLENS “did not demonstrate the ability to survive in its intended operational environment.” Flaws were also found in the airships’ software and communications programs.

So it was probably not a surprise to anyone familiar with JLENS when one of two blimps took off without explanation or provocation on a calm day. FOX News reported that Raytheon promotional materials insist that the tether, which “carries power up to the JLENS radar,” is made of Vectran and “has withstood storms in the excess of 100 knots.” However, in the “unlikely event” a ship becomes unmoored, according to Raytheon, “there are a number of procedures and systems in place which are designed to bring the aerostat down in a safe manner.” In this case, the Pentagon confirmed that the wayward blimp was shot down.

With this latest debacle, Congress is again questioning the program. Reps. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, and Elijah Cummings, D-Md., chairman and ranking member of the House oversight committee, sent joint letters to Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx on Thursday seeking all documents and contracts relating to JLENS, to help them “understand whether JLENS is a worthwhile investment of taxpayer dollars,” FOX reported.

After 17 years, it certainly is not a worthwhile investment. The program is AWOL, just like the blimp. Time to belatedly deflate it, permanently.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Friday, March 29

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Initiative promoter Tim Eyman takes a selfie photo before the start of a session of Thurston County Superior Court, Wednesday, Feb. 10, 2021, in Olympia, Wash. Eyman, who ran initiative campaigns across Washington for decades, will no longer be allowed to have any financial control over political committees, under a ruling from Superior Court Judge James Dixon Wednesday that blasted Eyman for using donor's contributions to line his own pocket. Eyman was also told to pay more than $2.5 million in penalties. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Initiative fee increase protects process, taxpayers

Bumped up to $156 from $5, the increase may discourage attempts to game the initiative process.

Schwab: Who was Langerhans? And when’s the ferry to his islets?

The Herald’s resident retired surgeon slices into the anatomy of the etymology of our anatomy.

Comment: Cervial cancer treatable; if you’re screened for it

A screening for cervical cancer can detect cancerous or precancerous cells and direct treatment.

Comment: Framers gave us Goldilocks Constitution; let’s use it

It was meant to be resilient, not perfect, but it has to be used as designed toward workable solutions.

Comment: GOP in Congress isn’t fighting crime; it’s arming it

Budget cuts to the FBI and ATF and other riders have made it easier for criminals to get firearms.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, March 28

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Washington state senators and representatives along with Governor Inslee and FTA Administrator Nuria Fernandez break ground at the Swift Orange Line on Tuesday, April 19, 2022 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Community Transit making most of Link’s arrival

The Lynnwood light rail station will allow the transit agency to improve routes and frequency of buses.

Protecting forests and prevent another landslide like Oso

Thank you for the powerful and heartbreaking article about the Oso landslide… Continue reading

Boeing’s downfall started when engineers demoted

Boeing used to be run by engineers who made money to build… Continue reading

Learn swimming safety to protect kids at beach, pool

Don’t forget to dive into water safety before hitting the pool or… Continue reading

An image of Everett Mayor Cassie Franklin is reflected in a storefront window during the State of the City Address on Thursday, March 21, 2024, at thee Everett Mall in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State of city address makes case for Everett’s future

Mayor Franklin outlines challenges and responses as the city approaches significant decisions.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.