Separating hype from science in debate over sports and brain damage

  • By Ramesh Raghupathi, Eugene Hong and Thomas Trojian Special to The Philadelphia Inquirer
  • Friday, January 15, 2016 6:06pm
  • OpinionCommentarySports

We continue to hear their names: former NFL linebacker Junior Seau, Steelers Hall of Fame center Mike Webster, Eagles safety Andre Waters, Hall of Fame quarterback and sports commentator Frank Gifford. Since their deaths, they have become high-profile examples of people diagnosed with chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), a neurodegenerative condition for which there is no cure and that can be diagnosed only by autopsy, after a person dies.

Former Raiders running back Maurice Jones-Drew and 49ers linebacker Chris Borland may have voluntarily removed themselves from the game based in part on concerns that continuing to play football would increase their risk of developing CTE.

In the docudrama “Concussion,” Will Smith portrays Bennet Omalu, the doctor who, among others, is credited with bringing to light the evidence of CTE in the brains of former NFL players. In doing so, he also exposed a problem that needs further evaluation to determine its significance. Now out in theaters, the film has already added fuel to a national discussion.

As many experts will agree, however, the relationship between developing CTE and playing football remains unclear. The link between the number of concussions a person sustains and the risk of developing CTE is also uncertain. A person sustaining a sports-related concussion is different from a person developing a myocardial infarction, where our ability to objectively diagnose and treat the patient in a way that will improve outcomes comes from experience and solid clinical research. We are still developing and learning the optimal means of evaluation and treatment of patients with sports-related concussions.

So we, as neuroscientists and sports-medicine clinicians, want to examine the following questions: What is our best understanding of the science on sports-related concussions? And how do we separate the science from the hype?

Here is what we know:

Postmortem analyses of the brains of some NFL and college football players demonstrate evidence of pathology, including neuronal loss, tau deposition and other findings, which are being called CTE.

Some living retired NFL players exhibit signs and symptoms of progressive neurodegenerative disease.

There is increased awareness about sports-related concussions.

Still, there are many important questions to be answered when it comes to determining the outcomes of sports-related concussions. Our studies and others from labs across the country are attempting to unravel these difficult questions about the short- and long-term effects of repeated brain trauma.

Here is what is unknown at this point:

Does a single concussion or repetitive concussions increase the risk of developing CTE?

Does a single concussion, overlapping concussions or separate multiple concussions result in permanent brain damage similar to that observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Lou Gehrig’s disease)?

Is there a threshold number of hits to the head or concussions at which a child (or adult) may be at higher risk of developing CTE?

Do genetics predispose certain players to develop permanent brain damage?

Although there are a few reports that attempt to link sports-related concussions and neurodegenerative diseases, what is lacking are the controlled and rigorous prospective studies necessary to address these unanswered questions. This is important for us to establish for all athletes and other people who sustain sports-related concussions.

Where does this leave us? How do we keep sports as safe as we can and yet not limit or curtail the benefits of organized competitive physical activity? Should we as a society restrict or ban contact or collision sports, particularly for young athletes?

We propose that we need more informed discussion on these critical decisions about sports. We need to be vigilant since association is not causation. The benefits of participation in team sports are many and clear, and include providing lessons on values such as winning and losing, increasing parent-child interaction, and encouraging children to better interact with society. Furthermore, scientific evidence supports the importance of physical activity and exercise in improving brain health, particularly during the formative years.

As parents ourselves, as well as scientists and health-care providers, we are passionate about improving our understanding of sports-related concussions. While we wholeheartedly welcome the increased public awareness and societal discourse, what is further required is rigorous medical research that determines the effect of sports-related concussions on long-term outcomes. Only then can the hype be separated from the science.

Ramesh Raghupathi is a neurobiology and anatomy professor at Drexel University College of Medicine in Philadelphia. Dr. Eugene Hong is associate dean for primary care and community health at Drexel. Dr. Thomas Trojian is a professor of family, community and preventive medicine at Drexel.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Patricia Robles from Cazares Farms hands a bag to a patron at the Everett Farmers Market across from the Everett Station in Everett, Washington on Wednesday, June 14, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Editorial: EBT program a boon for kids’ nutrition this summer

SUN Bucks will make sure kids eat better when they’re not in school for a free or reduced-price meal.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, April 23

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Students make their way through a portion of a secure gate a fence at the front of Lakewood Elementary School on Tuesday, March 19, 2024 in Marysville, Washington. Fencing the entire campus is something that would hopefully be upgraded with fund from the levy. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Levies in two north county districts deserve support

Lakewood School District is seeking approval of two levies. Fire District 21 seeks a levy increase.

Don’t penalize those without shelter

Of the approximately 650,000 people that meet Housing and Urban Development’s definition… Continue reading

Fossil fuels burdening us with climate change, plastic waste

I believe that we in the U.S. have little idea of what… Continue reading

Comment: We have bigger worries than TikTok alone

Our media illiteracy is a threat because we don’t understand how social media apps use their users.

toon
Editorial: A policy wonk’s fight for a climate we can live with

An Earth Day conversation with Paul Roberts on climate change, hope and commitment.

Snow dusts the treeline near Heather Lake Trailhead in the area of a disputed logging project on Tuesday, April 11, 2023, outside Verlot, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Move ahead with state forests’ carbon credit sales

A judge clears a state program to set aside forestland and sell carbon credits for climate efforts.

Eco-nomics: What to do for Earth Day? Be a climate hero

Add the good you do as an individual to what others are doing and you will make a difference.

Comment: Setting record strraight on 3 climate activism myths

It’s not about kids throwing soup at artworks. It’s effective messaging on the need for climate action.

People gather in the shade during a community gathering to distribute food and resources in protest of Everett’s expanded “no sit, no lie” ordinance Sunday, May 14, 2023, at Clark Park in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Comment: The crime of homelessness

The Supreme Court hears a case that could allow cities to bar the homeless from sleeping in public.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.