Candidates should reconsider trade deal

Among the many unfortunate aspects of the 2016 presidential campaign has been the bashing of “trade deals” by candidates across the political spectrum, including those who should know better, like the Democratic front-runner, former secretary of state Hillary Clinton.

As matters now stand, the next president — whether it’s Clinton, her Democratic rival Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vermont, or the Republican, Donald Trump — will be someone who opposes President Obama’s proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement with 11 nations. The TPP’s best chance at passage might be during the lame-duck session between the election and Inauguration Day, when Obama will still be in office and Congress will still be dominated by past supporters of the measure.

In case anyone campaigning for office in the meantime is interested in them, some fresh facts about the TPP have just emerged showing why the case against it — that it would “steal” jobs from hard-pressed American workers, as previous such agreements have purportedly done — is so badly overblown. A definitive 800-page estimate of the agreement’s impact on the American economy by the U.S. International Trade Commission shows that, by 2032, the TPP would raise U.S. annual real income by $57.3 billion above what it would have been otherwise, and it would create 128,000 full-time jobs. Given the enormous size of the U.S. economy, of course, these are modest improvements indeed: less than a percentage point in each case. Still, a net positive is a net positive.

The wins and losses would not be evenly distributed across all economic sectors. Agriculture and services would account for most of the income and job gains, reflecting the deal’s prying open of Japan’s previously closed markets. Output in manufacturing, natural resources and energy would fall by $10.8 billion (0.1 percent), reflective, in part, of greater imports of light manufactured goods such as footwear from Vietnam. U.S. automobile output and employment would grow slightly.

As was the case with previous agreements, the benefits of freer trade under the TPP would be diffuse and barely perceptible by the many, many people among whom they are distributed, but the costs would be concentrated and intensely felt. That economic reality creates a political one; indeed, it’s the political reality that accounts for some of the candidates’ posturing. Beyond economics, however, the agreement promises strategic benefits, including closer integration of the U.S. and East Asian markets and the establishment of U.S.-style market rules across a wide and wealthy region of the world where China is attempting to promote a neo-mercantilist playbook more to its advantage.

Those kinds of considerations used to matter to anyone serious about aspiring to the presidency of the United States and the global leadership that role entails. We can only hope that, whatever happens in November, they ultimately prevail.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Carson gets a chance to sound the horn in an Everett Fire Department engine with the help of captain Jason Brock during a surprise Make-A-Wish sendoff Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023, at Thornton A. Sullivan Park in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett voters will set course for city finances

This fall and in coming years, they will be asked how to fund and support the services they use.

Devotees of TikTok, Mona Swain, center, and her sister, Rachel Swain, right, both of Atlanta, monitor voting at the Capitol in Washington, as the House passed a bill that would lead to a nationwide ban of the popular video app if its China-based owner doesn't sell, Wednesday, March 13, 2024. Lawmakers contend the app's owner, ByteDance, is beholden to the Chinese government, which could demand access to the data of TikTok's consumers in the U.S. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Editorial: Forced sale of TikTok ignores network of problems

The removal of a Chinese company would still leave concerns for data privacy and the content on apps.

Rep. Strom Peterson, D-Edmonds, watches the State of the State speech by Gov. Jay Inslee on the second day of the legislative session at the Washington state Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, in Olympia, Wash. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)
Editorial: Legislature has its own production of ‘The Holdovers’

What state lawmakers left behind in good ideas that should get more attention and passage next year.

Comment: Measles outbreaks show importance of MMR vaccinations

The highly contagious disease requires a 95 percent vaccination rate to limit the spread of outbreaks.

Harrop: Should ‘affordable’ come at cost of quality of living?

As states push their cities to ignore zoning rules, the YIMBYs are covering for developers.

Saunders: Classified document cases show degrees of guilt

President Biden’s age might protect him, but the special prosecutor didn’t exonerate him either.

Comment: Clearing the internet of misinformation, deep fakes

With social networks’ spotty moderation record, users need to identify and call out problems they see.

Eco-Nomics: Price of gas, fossil fuels higher than you think

Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels force unseen costs in climate disasters, illness and more.

Vote against I-2117 to keep best tool to protect climate

We voters will be offered the opportunity to repeal Washington state’s Climate… Continue reading

Lack of maternal health care raises risks of deadly sepsis

In today’s contentious climate, we often hear political debates about maternal health… Continue reading

Trump’s stance on abortion isn’t moderate; it’s dangerous

Voters deserve to know the facts and the truth about what will… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.