Blocking guns laws guarantees that nothing changes

Let’s start here: No single effort, no stand-alone piece of legislation is certain to prevent the next Orlando, the next San Bernardino or even the next Marysville.

But a guarantee of certainty shouldn’t be the standard by which Congress and our state lawmakers adopt legislation. Dismissals that a legislative proposal “wouldn’t have worked” to prevent a particular massacre ignore the cumulative and combined effect that a range of laws and efforts can have.

There can be no certainty, for instance, that a ban on the sale of weapons to those on the federal terrorism watch list or suspected by the Justice Department of having ties to terrorist organizations would have prevented Omar Mateen from obtaining the AR-15 assault-style weapon that he used to kill 49 people and wound scores of others at an Orlando, Florida, nightclub. No certainty that a ban on assault-style weapons, themselves, would have prevented Mateen from getting his arsenal by other means.

But those laws offer the possibility that others, whether driven by mental illness or hateful ideology, who may come after Mateen can see their efforts to prepare for bloodbaths frustrated and slowed in order to give authorities the opportunity to stop mass shootings before they happen.

The logic in the watch-list ban is clear: If someone can’t be trusted to board a plane, why should they be trusted to obtain a firearm?

There are concerns for civil liberties. Mark Joseph Stern, in a recent opinion piece for Slate, argues that gun ownership is protected by the promise of due process, that the government must not revoke a Constitutional right without an opportunity for appeal.

But the legislation rejected by Congress in December following the San Bernardino, California, massacre and now being revived in Congress, does allow for an appeals process for those who might be misidentified or wrongly placed on either the no-fly list or the broader terrorism watch list.

Stern further argues that using the watch list to deny rights granted by the 2nd Amendment could invite similar weakening of civil liberties regarding freedom of speech and association and against unreasonable search and seizure. But exercise of those rights does not involve the same immediate risk for grievous harm inherent in a firearm. There’s simply less justification and little to gain by seeking limits on those rights.

There is much less concern for a loss of civil liberties in banning the sale of assault-style weapons. A similar ban was in effect from 1994 until 2004. It wasn’t a Supreme Court ruling that ended the ban, no Constitutional flaw, just the unwillingness of members of Congress, under the influence of the National Rifle Association, that allowed the law to lapse.

These are weapons that are appropriate only for theaters of war, not for movie theaters, nightclubs and schools. They are of no use to hunters or those seeking a weapon for self-defense.

At the state level there have been repeated attempts in recent years to pass legislation that would require that firearms that are accessible to those under 16 be kept in a locked box, gun safe or secured with a trigger lock. Failing to secure firearms around children could result in a charge of reckless endangerment, punishable by up to a year in jail, a $5,000 fine or both. Gun dealers would be required to offer for sale a gun safe or trigger lock to anyone buying a firearm.

Again, the benefits of added safety in homes with children outweigh the inconveniences of gun safes and trigger locks.

All such legislation requires consideration and debate, particularly when public safety is weighed against civil liberties. But potentially effective legislation is too often dismissed with a defeatist attitude that “it wouldn’t have made a difference.”

Which is the same guarantee offered by doing nothing.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

Initiative promoter Tim Eyman takes a selfie photo before the start of a session of Thurston County Superior Court, Wednesday, Feb. 10, 2021, in Olympia, Wash. Eyman, who ran initiative campaigns across Washington for decades, will no longer be allowed to have any financial control over political committees, under a ruling from Superior Court Judge James Dixon Wednesday that blasted Eyman for using donor's contributions to line his own pocket. Eyman was also told to pay more than $2.5 million in penalties. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)
Editorial: Initiative fee increase protects process, taxpayers

Bumped up to $156 from $5, the increase may discourage attempts to game the initiative process.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Thursday, March 28

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Washington state senators and representatives along with Governor Inslee and FTA Administrator Nuria Fernandez break ground at the Swift Orange Line on Tuesday, April 19, 2022 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Community Transit making most of Link’s arrival

The Lynnwood light rail station will allow the transit agency to improve routes and frequency of buses.

Protecting forests and prevent another landslide like Oso

Thank you for the powerful and heartbreaking article about the Oso landslide… Continue reading

Boeing’s downfall started when engineers demoted

Boeing used to be run by engineers who made money to build… Continue reading

Learn swimming safety to protect kids at beach, pool

Don’t forget to dive into water safety before hitting the pool or… Continue reading

An image of Everett Mayor Cassie Franklin is reflected in a storefront window during the State of the City Address on Thursday, March 21, 2024, at thee Everett Mall in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: State of city address makes case for Everett’s future

Mayor Franklin outlines challenges and responses as the city approaches significant decisions.

FILE - The massive mudslide that killed 43 people in the community of Oso, Wash., is viewed from the air on March 24, 2014. (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren, File)
Editorial: Mapping landslide risks honors those lost in Oso

Efforts continue in the state to map areas prone to landslides and prevent losses of life and property.

Comment: Why shootings have decreased but gun deaths haven’t

High-capacity magazines and ‘Glock switches’ that allow automatic fire have increased lethality.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, March 27

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Burke: ‘Why not write about Biden, for once?’ Don’t mind if I do.

They asked; I’ll oblige. Let’s consider what the president has accomplished since the 2020 election.

Comment: Catherine missed chance to dispel shame of cancer

She wasn’t obligated to do so, but she might have used her diagnosis to educate a sympathetic public.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.