Public hospitals put on notice to offer abortion services

When voters enacted the Reproductive Privacy Act by initiative in 1991, they did not create a passive protection for women’s choice.

The law says that the state cannot interfere with a woman’s right to have an abortion. And if it stopped there, the act could have been open to a somewhat laissez faire interpretation — preventing state agencies, officials or state-funded entities from actively blocking a woman’s access to abortion services.

But it didn’t stop there.

The law doesn’t simply assure women they are allowed to seek abortions at any public hospital, it tells them they are entitled to receive abortions services at any state-funded medical facility — if that health center provides any “maternity care benefits, services, or information to women through any program administered or funded … by the state.”

This distinction is at the heart of a court ruling in Mount Vernon this week in a 2015 lawsuit brought by the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington against Skagit County’s hospital district and Skagit Valley Hospital.

Interestingly, the hospital argued that it has no interest in denying abortion services — it just doesn’t have anyone on staff willing to do the procedures. And the same 1991 state law that protects women’s choice also protects the right of a physician to refuse to perform an abortion.

Instead of providing abortions, the hospital has been referring women to Planned Parenthood.

Not good enough, said Superior Court Judge Raquel Montoya-Lewis. The law says what it says, and that means the hospital must offer abortions on site.

The ACLU and pro-choice groups, not surprisingly, embraced this affirmation of the 1991 abortion rights law. And the ACLU has reportedly warned hospital districts on Whidbey Island and in Jefferson and Mason counties that they could face similar lawsuits.

The hospital districts are caught between two separate rights: Women are entitled to abortion services at their facilities — but members of their staffs cannot be compelled to perform abortions.

It is remarkable that 25 years have passed since these specific protections were written into Washington law, but this conflict has persisted.

Until now, hospital districts like Skagit have handled the situation in a passive manner, conveniently sending women elsewhere for their abortions. This week’s ruling seems to send the message that they must proactively seek out physicians who are willing to perform abortions and give them jobs or privileges at public hospitals.

Today, numerous states are inventing elaborate obstacles for women seeking abortions (and Texas legislators may earn the greatest notoriety, but they are not alone). But with the Reproductive Privacy Act on its books — and with this week’s decision by Montoya-Lewis — our state steadfastly affirms a woman’s choice.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, March 19

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Students use a 3D model to demonstrate their groups traffic solutions at Hazelwood Elementary School on Wednesday, March 29, 2023 in Lynnwood, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Editorial: Your choice, drivers; slow down or pay up

More traffic cameras will soon be in use in cities and highways, with steep penalties for violations.

Protect Affordable Care Act by rejecting Trump

The stakes are high in this year’s presidential election. If candidate Donald… Continue reading

Support candidates who support schools

I promised I would stop writing these letters because the gates of… Continue reading

Biden must stop supplying weapons to Israel, Ukraine

Bad foreign policy will come back to haunt us in the long… Continue reading

Comment: Flow of U.S. guns into Mexico is other border crisis

Guns, legal and illegal, are contributing to crime and instability in Mexico, driving many to seek asylum.

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Carson gets a chance to sound the horn in an Everett Fire Department engine with the help of captain Jason Brock during a surprise Make-A-Wish sendoff Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023, at Thornton A. Sullivan Park in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett voters will set course for city finances

This fall and in coming years, they will be asked how to fund and support the services they use.

Devotees of TikTok, Mona Swain, center, and her sister, Rachel Swain, right, both of Atlanta, monitor voting at the Capitol in Washington, as the House passed a bill that would lead to a nationwide ban of the popular video app if its China-based owner doesn't sell, Wednesday, March 13, 2024. Lawmakers contend the app's owner, ByteDance, is beholden to the Chinese government, which could demand access to the data of TikTok's consumers in the U.S. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Editorial: Forced sale of TikTok ignores network of problems

The removal of a Chinese company would still leave concerns for data privacy and the content on apps.

Rep. Strom Peterson, D-Edmonds, watches the State of the State speech by Gov. Jay Inslee on the second day of the legislative session at the Washington state Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, in Olympia, Wash. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)
Editorial: Legislature has its own production of ‘The Holdovers’

What state lawmakers left behind in good ideas that should get more attention and passage next year.

Comment: Measles outbreaks show importance of MMR vaccinations

The highly contagious disease requires a 95 percent vaccination rate to limit the spread of outbreaks.

Harrop: Should ‘affordable’ come at cost of quality of living?

As states push their cities to ignore zoning rules, the YIMBYs are covering for developers.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.