TUMWATER — Commercial fishermen in Washington and Oregon say a proposal to ban gillnets from the main stem of the lower Columbia River would destroy their livelihood, while supporters say the plan would protect endangered salmon.
The Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission heard from dozens of speakers on the issue at a public hearing in Tumwater on Saturday.
Commissioners are considering a contentious proposal that would phase out the use of gillnets by non-tribal fishers on the main river by 2017 and give priority to recreational fishing there. The proposed rules would move the centuries-old practice of gillnetting, the primary commercial-fishing tool, to side channels and tributaries.
Washington state commissioners are scheduled to vote at its next meeting set for Jan. 11-12 in Olympia.
The Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission approved similar rules on Dec. 7.
A bistate work group assembled by Oregon Gov. John Kitzhaber recommended the gillnet ban and other major changes to salmon and sturgeon fisheries in the lower Columbia River. The group included three commission members each from the Oregon and Washington.
Kitzhaber requested that the rules be developed as a compromise after a group of environmentalists and recreational fishing interests pushed a ballot measure that would have banned gillnets altogether next year.
On Saturday, the proposal drew intense opposition from commercial fishermen, who warned of lost jobs and livelihoods from limiting the use of gillnets and said the proposal was more about allocating resources to sport fisherman than conserving them.
“There is no need for this plan,” Georgia Marincovich, whose husband, Jack, is a longtime gillnet fishermen, told commissioners.
Critics say gillnets are harmful to salmon restoration because they kill many of the fish they catch but can’t differentiate between endangered fish and targeted species. Gillnets hang under the water surface and snag fish by the gills.
Washington has been studying alternative fishing gear to see whether it is safer for endangered fish. The most-touted method is a purse seine, which encircles fish in the river then is pulled shut at the bottom to trap them. Fishers can sort out endangered fish and set them free.
But commercial fishermen say the proposed alternative fishing gear — such as beach and purse seines — won’t work, questioning whether they could be economically viable on the Columbia.
Otis Hunsinger, an Oregon commercial fisherman, said “this plan ain’t going to work for me.”
Hunsinger said he would have to buy more expensive equipment because his 24-foot boat is too small for him to be able to use seines.
Supporters, meanwhile, urged commissioners to approve the new rules and protect the region’s salmon.
Stan Brogdon, president of CCA Washington, a statewide advocacy group for salmon and steelhead, called the policy fair, forward-thinking and long overdue.
“Gillnets are incapable of selective harvest,” he said, adding that the time had come to remove them from the main Columbia River.
Recreational fishers say gillnets are harmful to the recovery of salmon and steelhead — 13 species are listed under the federal Endangered Species Act.
The proposed rules prioritize recreational fishing on the main stem of the lower Columbia and relegate gillnetting to off-channels, which would see more hatchery salmon releases.
The proposal would give sport fishermen larger shares of salmon in the main stem of the Columbia. It would also require sport anglers fishing for salmon and steelhead in the main Columbia and its tributaries to use barbless hooks beginning in 2013.
Jody Mather, who guides fishing trips in Washington and Oregon, said the proposal to prohibit the retention of white sturgeon would devastate his business. “If you stop this fishery, you completely take the business that took me 16 years to build,” he said, adding, “I’m done.”
Tribal fisheries are not affected by the proposed new rules.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
