Boeing: NW’s fickle partner

Last year, Olympia lawmakers went eyeball to eyeball with Boeing, and lawmakers blinked. (OK, Boeing had them at “hello.”)

The $8.7 billion tax package, the largest state tax break in U.S. history, was designed to secure production of the 777X and fabrication of its carbon-fiber wing. It was informed by mistakes made in 2003, when sweeteners to land the 787 Dreamliner avoided any mention of a second, out-of-state assembly line.

Enter Charleston, S.C.

This time, Olympia’s proactive thank-you was minus a no-net-job loss provision.

The zeroing out of 1,000 Puget Sound-area engineering jobs throws that omission into relief.

“We as a state did not agree to $8.7 billion worth of tax breaks for these companies so that they could create minimum-wage manufacturing jobs, and move good-paying engineering jobs out of the state,” IAM District 751 Legislative Director Larry Brown told The Herald.

Northwesterners lampoon South Carolina as a Boeing toady, but lawmakers in Columbia were farsighted enough to incorporate job-specific numbers in exchange for public money. Section 2 (ii) of South Carolina’s 2009 incentive package reads, “the taxpayer creates at least three thousand eight hundred full-time new jobs at the single manufacturing facility during that seven-year period.” There is no comparable job-number provision in Washington 2013 package.

Tax policy is a barometer of political influence. Those with the sharpest elbows and the most loot snare exemptions. If a state budget gives expression to public values — including support for K-12 education and health care — tax policy is the undertow, the force unseen.

As The Herald’s Dan Catchpole and Jerry Cornfield report, the exodus of engineers, along with a sober aha that there may not be a net increase of Boeing jobs in the Pacific Northwest, is compelling a few lawmakers to revisit the package.

It’s a noble, if quixotic mission, with a nanosecond half-life come next session.

Sen. Bob Hasegawa, D-Seattle, a veteran of the labor movement, pushed language to keep engineering and design jobs for the 777X based in Washington. As The Herald reports, Hasegawa was rebuffed. “We’ve got a very clean bill. We are going to keep it this way,” Sen. Andy Hill, R-Redmond, said at the time.

It was clean enough to blow a thousand engineering jobs through. Hasegawa was prescient.

If the bottom line drove decision-making, Washington still would have landed the 777X deal, tax package or no. An educated workforce, a sublime place to live and raise a family, an aerospace culture of integrity and performance.

Bluff calling requires backbone. In matters related to Boeing, political courage falls away.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 17

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Viewpoints: Moving from grief to good 5 years after shooting

The determination of Sandy Hook families to turn unfathomable tragedy into good must be honored.

Commentary: Region has to consider options for U.S. 2 trestle

Waiting for lawmakers to pass another gas tax isn’t an option. We have to move forward now.

Commentary: Tighter rein needed on opioid makers, distrbutors

Doctors are working to better control prescriptions, but that won’t be enough to stem the epidemic.

Parker: When ‘credibly accused’ replaces due process

Giving more weight to accusations may feel justified at some level, but this should give us pause.

Robinson: Trump was right — Alabama did the right thing

‘The people of Alabama will do the right thing,’ tweeted Trump. Sadly for him, they did just that.

Petri: Ending net neutrality means innovation of bad options

With net neutrality’s end, consumers can choose to get worse service unless they pay more. Hooray!

Will: Whirlpool has Washington in a protectionist spin cycle

The appliance maker wants a U.S. trade panel to impose a 50 percent tariff on imported machines.

Most Read