Businesses change, and so do benefits

I’m a local business owner, and the success of the region determines the success of my business to a large degree. That means I would most certainly be in favor of anything that would keep the production of the new 777X in the Puget Sound area.

I have to wonder why the leadership of the Machinists union would be surprised if Boeing were to move its production elsewhere. Considering the history of strikes against Boeing, and the fact that even the union hall in Everett has a sculpture of striking workers out front, I can certainly understand how Boeing would feel the Machinists union does not have the company’s best interest at heart. Certainly the Machinists deserve fair pay, the best benefits possible, and all the rights and privileges that any other skilled worker is entitled to. But times are a-changin’.

Like any large corporation, there is an inequity between what the workers make and what the executives/management makes. That’s the way it is, and that’s the way it has always been. Unfortunately, workers are now faced with a new reality when it comes to health-care benefits and retirement benefits. The days of full pensions and fully paid medical benefits are behind us. For better or worse, businesses all across America are doing away with traditional benefits and requiring employees to contribute to retirement funds and help pay for medical insurance. Why should Boeing be any different?

For the union to vote not to accept the new package offer by Boeing is, in my opinion, a self-defeating action. I lived in Atlanta in the mid-’80s when the Eastern Airline pilots went on strike. That ended badly. Eastern declared bankruptcy, and the pilots found themselves without a job. I fear that Boeing will almost certainly start moving jobs to other states where workers are willing to work for less. It may not sit well with the Machinists union, but the reality is that corporations will most certainly manufacture where it costs less.

I’m certain there are many people who disagree with the idea that Boeing has the right to change the benefits it offers its workers. But the harsh reality is that Boeing is in business to make money and has a responsibility to its shareholders to reduce costs wherever possible. Millions of Americans would be happy to have the benefits that were presented in Boeing’s contract extension offer. If the majority of the Boeing machinists feel this offer is unfair, then so be it. But if Boeing decides to move production to another state, these workers need to be prepared to find other jobs that would measure up to what they passed up.

Sven Mogelgaard lives in Mill Creek.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Sept. 23

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Why Snohomish County should shoot for Amazon’s HQ2

Editorial: Not that we have a real shot at it, but because of what else we might attract here.

Schwab: Gift of a Shaolin priest provides lesson in humility

A post-surgery gift from a kung fu master at first seemed like an extravagance of little use.

Commentary: There’s room for a diplomatic North Korea solution

President Trump has the opportunity to use diplomacy to keep North Korea in check. Tweets won’t work.

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Sept. 22

A sketchy look at the day’s political stories.… Continue reading

Ignatius: Only creative thinking, not taunts, will deter Kim

The U.S. needs options and a coldblooded rationality, the opposite of Trump’s schoolboy taunts.

Harrop: Why Trump will likley stick with Paris climate deal

Among the reasons: The public’s support for action on climate change and Trump’s poll numbers.

Dionne: Trump’s tough talk at U.N. only leaves us weaker

In talking up “sovereignty,” Trump provides cover to the likes of North Korea and Venezuela.

States’ report puts voter fraud claims in proper perspective

Editorial: A review by the state shows questionable ballots by only 74 of 3.36 million votes cast.

Most Read