Don’t feed the bears, or Wi-fi companies

The following editorial appeared in the Chicago Tribune on Monday:

Oh give me a phone, where the buffalo roam. Actually, don’t. Please.

The National Park Service is under mounting pressure to allow wireless coverage in the peaceful unplugged spaces where the deer and antelope play. What a terrible idea. The great outdoors is supposed to be about twitter without the capital ‘T.’ How are you supposed to hear it if your cellphone is chirping?

Park managers in Yellowstone and Glacier national parks are considering requests from telecommunications companies that want to erect or upgrade towers, according to a Reuters report.

Tourists basically fall into two camps: the ones who can’t relax in any setting where the reception registers less than three bars and the ones who want to confiscate those cellphones and pitch them in a lake.

Wi-fi enhances the park experience, we’re told. It’s not just about uploading all those geyser photos directly to Facebook. Tourists can use their smartphones to identify flora and fauna, or to get directions to popular park features. And cellphones promote safety. Think of all the times you’ve read about lost hikers, saved by their GPS.

If you’ve actually been to Yellowstone, you can imagine the downside. Think about driving those winding roads behind someone who’s yammering (or texting) while piloting an SUV. Think of the kids, impatient for Old Faithful to erupt, amusing themselves by playing “Angry Birds.” Think of the broken silence outside your tent: “Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now? Can you hear me now?”

Imagine a family photo expedition. Scouring the landscape from your car, you spot a magnificent bull elk feeding at the edge of a lake. You pull over. The driver of the car that’s been riding your bumper for the last 10 minutes pulls over too. Then another, then another. Together you creep closer until you’re almost within telephoto range and then, just as you’re about to raise your camera to frame the shot, someone’s phone rings. You end up with a nice photo of the south end of a northbound elk.

Next scene: Up before dawn in hopes of seeing a bear in its natural setting – as opposed to the ones in the parking lot, mooching from minivans – you happen upon a mother and her cubs, fishing for trout. Your party is crashed by a dozen bozos using a bear-finder app.

The problem is that some people don’t appreciate the difference between a national park and a theme park. It’s one thing to use your cellphone to warn your pals that the line at Space Mountain is two hours long. It’s another thing entirely to tweet the coordinates of a baby moose sighting.

People who can’t live without their cellphones aren’t just the wrong demographic for Yellowstone. They’re the very demographic the rest of us go to Yellowstone to escape. Let’s not encourage them. The call of the wild doesn’t need a ring tone.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 17

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Viewpoints: Moving from grief to good 5 years after shooting

The determination of Sandy Hook families to turn unfathomable tragedy into good must be honored.

Commentary: Region has to consider options for U.S. 2 trestle

Waiting for lawmakers to pass another gas tax isn’t an option. We have to move forward now.

Commentary: Tighter rein needed on opioid makers, distrbutors

Doctors are working to better control prescriptions, but that won’t be enough to stem the epidemic.

Parker: When ‘credibly accused’ replaces due process

Giving more weight to accusations may feel justified at some level, but this should give us pause.

Robinson: Trump was right — Alabama did the right thing

‘The people of Alabama will do the right thing,’ tweeted Trump. Sadly for him, they did just that.

Petri: Ending net neutrality means innovation of bad options

With net neutrality’s end, consumers can choose to get worse service unless they pay more. Hooray!

Will: Whirlpool has Washington in a protectionist spin cycle

The appliance maker wants a U.S. trade panel to impose a 50 percent tariff on imported machines.

Most Read