Judge Chris Lanese talks with attorneys during a hearing in Thurston County Superior Court in Olympia, in October. Lanese, last week, ruled in favor of a media coalition that sought to apply the state Public Records Act to state legislators. (Ted S. Warren/Associated Press file photo)

Judge Chris Lanese talks with attorneys during a hearing in Thurston County Superior Court in Olympia, in October. Lanese, last week, ruled in favor of a media coalition that sought to apply the state Public Records Act to state legislators. (Ted S. Warren/Associated Press file photo)

Editorial: Judge rightly applies records law to legislators

As the very name implies, the Public Records Act, first adopted in 1972, applies to state lawmakers.

By The Herald Editorial Board

State law that applies to the goose, applies to the gander.

A Superior Court judge last week sided with a media coalition seeking to apply the state’s public records law to state lawmakers just as it must be followed by other elected officials, agencies and local governments.

For decades, state legislators have attempted to excuse themselves from provisions of the state’s Public Records Act, created by voters in 1972, which requires elected officials, state agencies and all forms of local government to comply with specific requests for public records and documents.

Last fall, a coalition of 10 news organizations, including the Associated Press and The Herald’s Sound Publishing, challenged lawmakers’ most recent refusal to respond to a records request that sought emails, work calendars and any staff complaints involving alleged sexual harassment by lawmakers from each of the 147 legislators.

We’ve pointed out previously how clear the intent of the Public Records Act is, which states:

“The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may maintain control over the instruments that they have created.”

Thurston County Superior Court Judge Chris Lanese was just as direct in his ruling:

“The plain and unambiguous language of the Public Records Act applies to the offices of senators and representatives,” Lanese concluded.

While Lanese’s ruling preserved an exemption for the Legislature, itself, as well as the administrative offices of the Senate and House, Lanese ruled that because a lawmaker had forwarded documents to those offices didn’t then extend the exemption to the documents; records received or drafted by legislators are subject to the Public Records Act, the judge wrote.

While appeals and a final decision left to the state Supreme Court are likely, lawmakers ought to begin work now to comply with the act and join their public brethren. Some lawmakers already are acknowledging this, including state Sen. Guy Palumbo, D-Maltby, who told The Herald: “I am of the mindset that we should craft a bill that subjects us to the Public Records Act like local government but also takes care of some legitimate privacy issues.”

Rep. Gerry Pollet, D-Seattle, has already done so, filing legislation that would specify the types of documents that would be covered, including calendars and schedules; administrative budget and financial records; personnel leave, travel and payroll records; reports to the Legislature; correspondence with individuals outside the Legislature seeking to lobby lawmakers on bills; and findings and reports regarding misconduct by lawmakers or staff.

Pollet’s bill would exempt personal information and schedules, as it would “protect communications from whistle-blowers” reporting fraud or misconduct, he said in a news release.

Pollet’s bill is a step in the right direction, but lawmakers should take care not to be so prescriptive in their language that they create an exemption or allow one to be assumed that wasn’t intended. Communications from whistle-blowers are among the very documents that should be released when requested. But it can be done in a way — such as through redactions of identifying information — that protects the anonymity of those reporting fraud or abuse.

Legislation should also apply the same methods of fees and cost recovery for individual lawmakers’ offices that the Legislature developed last year to help agencies and local government meet the costs of responding to public records requests. A side benefit to the judge’s decision, the application of the law to legislators should provide them a better understanding of the costs associated with the Public Records Act.

For nearly 50 years, we have expected state agencies and local governments to comply with the Public Records Act. Its very name implies why; the records belong to the public. As it should have all along, that applies to state lawmakers, too.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

RGB version
Editorial cartoons for Monday, March 18

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Carson gets a chance to sound the horn in an Everett Fire Department engine with the help of captain Jason Brock during a surprise Make-A-Wish sendoff Saturday, Oct. 21, 2023, at Thornton A. Sullivan Park in Everett, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Editorial: Everett voters will set course for city finances

This fall and in coming years, they will be asked how to fund and support the services they use.

Devotees of TikTok, Mona Swain, center, and her sister, Rachel Swain, right, both of Atlanta, monitor voting at the Capitol in Washington, as the House passed a bill that would lead to a nationwide ban of the popular video app if its China-based owner doesn't sell, Wednesday, March 13, 2024. Lawmakers contend the app's owner, ByteDance, is beholden to the Chinese government, which could demand access to the data of TikTok's consumers in the U.S. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Editorial: Forced sale of TikTok ignores network of problems

The removal of a Chinese company would still leave concerns for data privacy and the content on apps.

Rep. Strom Peterson, D-Edmonds, watches the State of the State speech by Gov. Jay Inslee on the second day of the legislative session at the Washington state Capitol, Tuesday, Jan. 9, 2024, in Olympia, Wash. (AP Photo/Lindsey Wasson)
Editorial: Legislature has its own production of ‘The Holdovers’

What state lawmakers left behind in good ideas that should get more attention and passage next year.

Comment: Measles outbreaks show importance of MMR vaccinations

The highly contagious disease requires a 95 percent vaccination rate to limit the spread of outbreaks.

Harrop: Should ‘affordable’ come at cost of quality of living?

As states push their cities to ignore zoning rules, the YIMBYs are covering for developers.

Saunders: Classified document cases show degrees of guilt

President Biden’s age might protect him, but the special prosecutor didn’t exonerate him either.

Comment: Clearing the internet of misinformation, deep fakes

With social networks’ spotty moderation record, users need to identify and call out problems they see.

Eco-Nomics: Price of gas, fossil fuels higher than you think

Greenhouse gas emissions from fossil fuels force unseen costs in climate disasters, illness and more.

Vote against I-2117 to keep best tool to protect climate

We voters will be offered the opportunity to repeal Washington state’s Climate… Continue reading

Lack of maternal health care raises risks of deadly sepsis

In today’s contentious climate, we often hear political debates about maternal health… Continue reading

Trump’s stance on abortion isn’t moderate; it’s dangerous

Voters deserve to know the facts and the truth about what will… Continue reading

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.