Enough stalling on Hanford

In the blur of last week’s news, an inter-governmental battle reached critical mass. It’s wonky, involves multiple acronyms, and pitches up sense-dulling statements.

It also goes to the future of the most contaminated spot in the Western Hemisphere and the federal government’s reckless pattern of heel-dragging.

On April 18, Attorney General Bob Ferguson and Gov. Jay Inslee gave thumbs down to the U.S Department of Energy’s March 31 proposal to amend the timeline and other features of the 2010 consent decree governing the retrieval and treatment of high-level radioactive waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation. The Hanford consent decree is a binding agreement that flows from a 2008 lawsuit.

Last month, U.S. Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz met with the governor and the attorney general to discuss the federal government’s revised proposal. Inslee and Ferguson were underwhelmed. In October, the Energy Department informed Ferguson that the feds were at “substantial risk” for failing to meet three consent-decree milestones. Those delays will have a domino effect on all the agreed-to deadlines for the Hanford waste-treatment plant designed to transform high-level radioactive waste into glassified “logs.”

“The people of our region made a significant sacrifice for our nation when the U.S. selected the Hanford site to produce plutonium as part of the Manhattan Project during World War II,” Ferguson said in a statement Friday. “Today’s announcement should serve as notice to Energy that we are considering taking the next legal step as early as next week.”

For its part, the U.S. Department of Justice (the feds’ army of attorneys against Washington’s platoon) rebuffed the state’s proposed amendments.

“DOE cannot accept it for a number of reasons,” they wrote, “including the fact that it does not adequately account for the realities of technical-issue resolution, project management imperatives, and fiscal constraints.”

“Fiscal constraints” is code for cover-your-budget. DOE has the funding to address what it terms in its just-released strategic plan, “the legal and moral imperative of cleaning up legacy nuclear waste to protect human health and the environment.” (Alas, that moral imperative only merits half a page in DOE’s 32-page vision.)

Inslee and Ferguson will trigger the 40-day dispute-resolution phase as early as today. If that collapses, the issue will be kicked back to the court, which is institutionally prone to do the right thing — something the feds hope to sidestep.

Enough can-kicking. Hanford cleanup needs to become DOE’s highest priority.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, Oct. 23

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Can we please keep a civil tongue?

A recent EdCC forum asked panelists: Are you alarmed at the tone and tenor of civic discourse today?

Simoneaux: Our better angels have them outnumbered

You wouldn’t know it listening to some in news and politics, but there are good people out there.

Parker: What we needed to hear from a Republican president

It’s just too bad it wasn’t Trump speaking. Instead, he was being spoken to.

Everett mayoral race: Franklin best on homelessness issue

Regarding the Oct. 8, 2017 letter concerning the Everett mayoral election, I… Continue reading

Some limits would stem nation’s bloodshed from guns

Words can’t quantify or describe the horror of what unfolded in Las… Continue reading

Changes in culture explain recent shootings

Why? Why did he do it? They all ask about the Las… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Oct. 22

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Viewpoints: Gun control and the Founding Fathers

Laws regarding gun registration, public carry and more were around long before the Second Amendment.

Most Read