Follow up on who foots the bill

I would like to see a follow-up story on the article in the Sunday paper, “Ruling leads to $5M in refunds.” Does that mean there will no longer be fire service, schools, etc., for anyone living on tribal land? Can the county back-charge for the amount of services that have been provided from 2011 to present? In order for the businesses and homeowners to get service would they have to sign a contract with Fire District 15? What will the impact be?

As I read the article it leads me to believe that the property owners outside the tribal lands are going to have to foot the bill for the services rendered on tribal land. That means that the big box stores are going to increase their bottom line at the off-tribal land property owner’s expense.

Gerry Ozburn

Mountlake Terrace

More in Opinion

Editorial: School funding half-full, half-empty, but not ample

The Supreme Court says the state’s school funding plan won’t meet its deadline. So there’s work to do.

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Nov. 19

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Viewpoint: How to bridge the political divide at Thanksgiving

With a little bravery and some listening skills, the holiday dinner table needn’t be a battlefield.

Commentary: Legislature hasn’t fixed teacher pay issue

Schools with larger poor and minority populations are still less capable of keeping good teachers.

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Senate Republicans make bigger mess of tax bill

Senate Republicans are using repeal of an Obamacare mandate to win votes for their tax reform bill.

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Nov. 16

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Nov. 15

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Most Read