How are threats a ‘compromise’?

In a televised news report on some local eighth grade school children who are traveling to Washington D.C., who now won’t be a able to visit the Smithsonian exhibits, Washington or Lincoln memorials because of federal government shutdown, the students were saying that elected officials could not compromise.

So I was wondering what exactly is the “compromise” the Republicans would make? They would not shut down government or taking further steps to damage the economy if the Affordable Health Care Act, passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court, was delayed or canceled?

It reminds me of the child who “compromises” with his parents: “Give me what I want for Christmas, and I won’t start a fire in the garage.”

Tim Koss

Everett

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 17

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Viewpoints: Moving from grief to good 5 years after shooting

The determination of Sandy Hook families to turn unfathomable tragedy into good must be honored.

Commentary: Region has to consider options for U.S. 2 trestle

Waiting for lawmakers to pass another gas tax isn’t an option. We have to move forward now.

Commentary: Tighter rein needed on opioid makers, distrbutors

Doctors are working to better control prescriptions, but that won’t be enough to stem the epidemic.

Parker: When ‘credibly accused’ replaces due process

Giving more weight to accusations may feel justified at some level, but this should give us pause.

Robinson: Trump was right — Alabama did the right thing

‘The people of Alabama will do the right thing,’ tweeted Trump. Sadly for him, they did just that.

Petri: Ending net neutrality means innovation of bad options

With net neutrality’s end, consumers can choose to get worse service unless they pay more. Hooray!

Will: Whirlpool has Washington in a protectionist spin cycle

The appliance maker wants a U.S. trade panel to impose a 50 percent tariff on imported machines.

Most Read