Judgment at high speed

The trouble with high-speed police pursuits is biology. Adrenaline plus (nearly always) testosterone, and behavior can mimic road rage. Judgment blurs.

As The Herald’s Rikki King reports, a high-speed chase that left a suspected drunk driver dead Monday marked the third fatal pursuit in Snohomish County since May. Are these situational responses statistically significant?

Emergency vehicles are exempted from traffic laws as long as life and property aren’t at risk. It’s OK to lead-foot a red light to ferry a cardiac patient to the hospital or for cops to pursue a bank robber (otherwise the crook handbook would simply advise, “Go 10 mph over the speed limit.”) But how fast is too fast?

Monday’s crash is under investigation. The victim, Eric John Breum, 55, of Skykomish, had seven DUI convictions and was declared “a danger to the public” in King County court records. The pursuit unfolded on the Northwest’s highway of death, U.S. 2. More than 60 people have been killed on U.S. 2 since 1999.

One of the most heart-rending cases is the May 12 pursuit by Bothell police of a convicted felon through downtown Everett. The suspect rammed the car of Rachael Kamin, a Providence Hospital nurse, killing her.

On May 24, a driver attempted to outrun Lynnwood cops and crashed into a van driven by 72-year old Jerry Bennett, who died. Bennett’s estate filed a claim against the city of Lynnwood for $1.2 million.

The Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office pursuit policy reads, “At no time shall speed reach a point where it adversely affects the driver’s control of the vehicle and/or the driver’s ability to see and respond to other drivers thereby endangering life and/or property.” Officers have latitude, but the onus is on them, that judgment supplants biology.

Around the Pacific Northwest, law enforcement policies are as sensible as they are subjective. “When a deputy engages in a pursuit, he/she must weigh the risk of personal and public safety against the benefit of immediate apprehension of the offender,” the sheriff’s policy reads.

The kicker is to come up with a cost-benefit analysis in an adrenaline haze. Officers are required to end pursuits whenever the risks outweigh the danger to the public if the bad guy is not immediately nabbed. The Everett Police Department, which rewrote its policies in 2004 to err on the side of non-pursuit, emphasizes intervention protocols such as “stop sticks” and roadblocks. It also won’t censure officers who make the call to end a chase.

As departments revisit their policies, best practices again will be underlined. Harmonizing law enforcement standards with human nature and the public interest: It’s a Utopian-sounding, but indispensable mission.

More in Opinion

Editorial: Yet another owner for The Everett Clinic

After its brief time with DaVita, uncertainty returns for the clinic with its sale to an insurer.

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 10

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Viewpoints: Trump’s monumental mistake

The power to abolish or shrink monuments rests with Congress, not the president.

Commentary: How to begin to bridge the divide on immigration

Right and left need to step back from inaccuracies and entrenched positions to find agreement.

Commentary: Action needed now to make 2020 census count

The Census Bureau is lacking leadership and funding necessary to prepare for it.

Parker: Contrasts in how parties dealt with Franken, Moore

The Democrats sacrificed their bad actor; the Republicans are fully backing theirs.

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Dec. 9

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Robinson: Trump’s mutation of the Party of Lincoln is complete

If Roy Moore’s alleged grooming of teenagers can be ignored, then so too can Mueller’s investigation.

Petri: Questions to help clarify what is and isn’t a monument

If a bunch of white dudes are standing around it with torches, then it’s a cherished monument.

Most Read