Life sentence would end story

With the sentencing phase underway, federal prosecutors are seeking the death penalty for the Boston Marathon bomber. Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, now 21, was convicted on all 30 counts, including conspiracy and deadly use of a weapon of mass destruction in the 2013 attacks, which killed three people and injured 260, including 17 who lost limbs.

Prosecutor Nadine Pellegrini opened by showing a photo of Tsarnaev in his holding cell three months after the bombing, flipping off a surveillance camera, The New York Times reported.

“This is Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, unconcerned, unrepentant and unchanged,” Ms. Pellegrini said. “Without remorse, he remains untouched by the grief and the loss he caused, and he remains the unrepentant killer.”

If the federal prosecutors are concerned that Tsarnaev is unrepentant, why not keep him in prison for the rest of his days and see if he if he doesn’t become repentant? It’s not as if his repentance, now or later or never, will do anything to ease the pain of the victims and their families. Just as executing him will not do anything to ease the pain of the victims and their families.

As far as Tsarnaev (then 19) holding up his middle finger to a security camera, is his “bravado” really an argument for execution? Perhaps it might reflect fear? Isn’t it all irrelevant compared to his crimes?

Giving Tsarnaev the death penalty also raises the concern that other terrorists, homegrown or otherwise, will view him as a martyr. Sticking him in prison for the rest of his life takes away that terrorist-favored narrative.

A compelling argument against seeking execution comes from the parents of the youngest bombing victim, 8-year-old Martin Richard. (After his death, a heart-rending photo of him holding a school poster that says, “No more hurting people. Peace.” was circulated widely.)

Bill and Denise Richard, urged prosecutors to put Tsarnaev away for life instead of executing him because the appeals process would prolong the pain for years, and keep the terrorist in the public eye.

“We understand all too well the heinousness and brutality of the crimes committed. We were there. We lived it. The defendant murdered our 8-year-old son, maimed our 7-year-old daughter, and stole part of our soul,” the parents wrote in an opinion piece in the Boston Globe.

“As long as the defendant is in the spotlight, we have no choice but to live a story told on his terms, not ours,” the Richards wrote. “The minute the defendant fades from our newspapers and TV screens is the minute we begin the process of rebuilding our lives and our family.”

Let the rebuilding begin.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 10

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Yet another owner for The Everett Clinic

After its brief time with DaVita, uncertainty returns for the clinic with its sale to an insurer.

Viewpoints: Trump’s monumental mistake

The power to abolish or shrink monuments rests with Congress, not the president.

Commentary: How to begin to bridge the divide on immigration

Right and left need to step back from inaccuracies and entrenched positions to find agreement.

Commentary: Action needed now to make 2020 census count

The Census Bureau is lacking leadership and funding necessary to prepare for it.

Parker: Contrasts in how parties dealt with Franken, Moore

The Democrats sacrificed their bad actor; the Republicans are fully backing theirs.

Robinson: Trump’s mutation of the Party of Lincoln is complete

If Roy Moore’s alleged grooming of teenagers can be ignored, then so too can Mueller’s investigation.

Petri: Questions to help clarify what is and isn’t a monument

If a bunch of white dudes are standing around it with torches, then it’s a cherished monument.

Snohomish PUD should heed its values on hydro project

Two recent letters to the editor in The Herald on Nov. 20… Continue reading

Most Read