PUD downplays real costs

Thank you for the Feb. 9 article on the proposed Sunset Falls Dam. PUD assures us that “no decision has been made” and asks the public to “hold judgment until they see the final proposal,” but that is becoming increasingly difficult because PUD is so obviously downplaying the real costs.

The article would lead one to believe that PUD intends to spend just $1 million on the studies that will determine the fate of this project. But in fact, PUD will have many, many millions of dollars invested by the time the studies are complete.

PUD has already purchased several parcels of real estate and negotiated purchase options for additional property at the proposed dam site. PUD awarded a $900,000 contract earlier this month for additional design and engineering work on Sunset Falls and is currently spending an estimated $400,000 on a second round of geotechnical studies that, under the revised study plan, will be further expanded at additional expense to deal with previously undisclosed landslide issues. All of these expenses are in addition to the estimated $1,138,000 yet to be spent on the recently approved study plans.

On top of the above mentioned $2.44 million in studies, PUD has already spent a very considerable amount of money on the preliminary design of the dam and trap and haul upgrades, preliminary geotechnical investigations, the hiring of specialist outside attorneys and in paying for more than two years of PUD staff and senior management time devoted to the project; not to mention the cost of promoting the project to the public. Just how much has been spent? PUD is not saying but it is probably safe to assume the amount is measured in additional millions of dollars.

By the time the commissioners are asked to decide, the PUD could be into the project so deep that there is no turning back. This is what the public is worried about and this is the reason why a candid discussion at this time is entirely appropriate.

David Wick

Marysville

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Nov. 20

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: School funding half-full, half-empty, but not ample

The Supreme Court says the state’s school funding plan won’t meet its deadline. So there’s work to do.

Simoneaux: In service of science, a month among icebergs

A NOAA ship takes scientists into an Antarctic ice field, when the path out starts to close in.

Saunders: Trump not repeating mistakes he made on ACA repeal

The president is taking care not to alienate Senate Republicans before the vote on tax reform.

Milbank: Not hearing what they want to, GOP simply ignores

Nonpartisan arbiters of fact are being disregarded on tax law, health care and judicial worthiness.

Snohomish PUD hydro project will harm salmon

A Nov. 9 article in The Herald focused on declining salmon and… Continue reading

Fronier should keep lifeline payphones in service

The public telephone at the Verlot service ranger station is a service… Continue reading

Vote makes it clear: No pot shops in Snohomish

The advisory vote on Proposition 1 in Snohomish on retail marijuana sales… Continue reading

Why gut Medicaid to pay for bombs?

Donald Trump, in a fit of pique over not being able to… Continue reading

Most Read