Strong ‘yes’ to Everett schools

School bonds and school boards are different animals. Everett families make the distinction, teasing out politics from mission.

A measure that preserves a stable tax rate and provides for the next generation of K-12 students defines the public interest. It’s one of many reasons that the 2014 Everett school-district bond merits a strong yes vote in February.

The bond is the product of a protracted process that would delight a public administration professor, with discussions at 14 board meetings since 2011, comprehensive work sessions, long-range enrollment and facilities planning updates, and a long-term capital facilities review. Public and cross-sector participation underscored inclusion with students, board, staff and the community. The goal was to harmonize the bond with the district’s strategic plan, capacity and enrollment projections, a facilities’ inventory, and anticipation of additional future needs such as full-day Kindergarten and K-3 class-size reductions. It’s a case study in complex planning that puts students and taxpayers first.

The district itself is a colossus, 15 miles long with shifting demographics. Beginning in the late 1960s, administrators began methodical planning to align bonds and levies with forecast needs. The 2014 bond may be the best scrubbed, most scrutinized proposal in district history.

The plan was fine-tuned and amended to include modernization of the Cascade High School science building with STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) programs in mind. The stable-tax rate plan for $259.4 million ($6.55 per $1,000 of assessed home value, the same rate as in 2013) involves new construction, modernizations and new technology. Phase 1 of a new high school (approximately 750 students), synthetic turf fields at two high schools, and building-system upgrades (think roofing and energy-management upgrades) are just some of the features.

School boards are lightning rods, and Everett has had an absurdly high profile with spats over transparency. Things have settled in what retiring school board member Ed Petersen calls “an evolving leadership culture,” and he’s right.

Make no mistake: The February bond vote has zilch to do with board personalities, resentment over the new administration building, or other perceived annoyances. And citizens can and should elbow the district on issues such as foreign language classes (now called “world language”) prior to high school.

Political quibbles are unrelated to the bond, which is a must. As historian and retired Everett school Principal Larry O’Donnell, a bond booster, observes, “You can’t steer the ship or solve any problems if you throw the fuel overboard.”

The Everett bond is about students, not politics. Make your vote count. Vote yes.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Wednesday, Oct. 18

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Endorsements for Snohomish City Council

Continuing Tuesday’s recommendations, the editorial board endorses Redmon, Countryman and Dana.

Burbank: What if we leveraged our aerospace advantages?

Why should Airbus build Bombardier jets in Alabama, when we have the labor force to build them here?

Ignatius: With ISIS on run, allied Iraqis, Kurds pick a fight

Warnings that a Kurdistan referendum would backfire weren’t heeded. Iraq responded.

Milbank: Trump’s Cabinet is best Cabinet ever; just ask him

Never has a Cabinet incurred so many probes and reprimands and endured more humiliation.

Everett mayoral race: Franklin is leader city needs

The upcoming election is an important one for Everett; we are electing… Continue reading

County council races: Sound leadership from Low, Nehring

It is commendable when someone steps forward to serve their community, especially… Continue reading

County Council, District 1: Nehring dedicated to constituents

When considering who to vote for I look not only at where… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Oct. 17

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Most Read