The difference of nonprofits

In 2003, a 25-year-old named Clint Borgen decided to become a lobbyist for the world’s poor. His plan was to pressure Congress to increase foreign aid to developing countries, with the ultimate goal of ending global poverty. He launched a nonprofit, The Borgen Project, which he funded by working on a fishing boat in Alaska.

Eleven years later, The Borgen Project is now a nationwide campaign with serious sway. Headquartered in Seattle, it has 350 interns in 220 cities and a Board of Directors featuring Congressman Adam Smith (D-Wash). And yet, despite its influence, The Borgen Project can only afford five paid staffers, three of whom are part-time. Borgen himself didn’t make a cent from the organization until January of this year, surviving off of odd jobs and temp work for the past decade.

When thousands of Washington’s college graduates start looking for work this spring, places like The Borgen Project won’t be able to pay them the same wages as Amazon, Microsoft or Boeing. Sometimes they won’t be able to pay them at all. Still, we should encourage college graduates to work at these small nonprofits, because the best minds should be taking on the globe’s gravest issues.

From eradicating diseases to cleaning water supplies to empowering oppressed women, nonprofits work for high stakes under tight deadlines with insufficient resources.

For some, working at a nonprofit will be an entry-level career with a less-than-desirable wage. For others, it will be an unpaid internship. In either case, it will be fulfilling, important, meaningful work. Connections will be made and a great deal will be learned.

Many college graduates scoff at the idea of working for low-paying nonprofits. They believe their degrees entitle them to make good money, which is probably true. But the nonprofit sector is, by design, starved for cash. Places like The Borgen Project have unpaid interns out of necessity, not greed, and the young innovators who work there aren’t being taken advantage of, they’re making sacrifices for what they believe in.

When it’s possible for these nonprofits to boost wages via increasing overhead, we should encourage them to. America’s top charity evaluators say investing in overhead is crucial to improving nonprofit performance. That includes paying employees more.

For the upcoming class of graduating seniors, the thought of working at a small nonprofit might be intimidating. But this is a generation that more than any before it claims to believe in the progressive values that nonprofits embody. If it won’t step up and take on the world’s worst problems, who will?

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Saturday, Nov. 18

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Senate Republicans make bigger mess of tax bill

Senate Republicans are using repeal of an Obamacare mandate to win votes for their tax reform bill.

Schwab: At home and abroad, Trump sets low bar for ‘great’

His Asian trip made the U.S. a bit player on the world stage. And the play’s not any better at home.

Does low voter turnout point to apathy toward local politics?

The November voter turnout displayed either burnout or apathy. Either way this… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Nov. 17

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Gerson: When lies become routine, corruption follows

We are witnessing what happens when conservatives become untethered from morality and religion.

Milbank: Truth is now out — ‘Bernie Bernstein’ broke all scandals

From Watergate to Roy Moore, Bernie robocalled random numbers, offering payouts for false claims.

Ignatius: Saudi prince tries to limit damage from brash moves

The crown prince, known as MBS, is fighting corruption, but taking big chances to combat it.

Harrop: Dems shouldn’t fret over another Hillary investigation

Launching a new witch hunt against Clinton is a sure sign that the heat’s been turned up on Trump.

Most Read