‘Well-regulated’ so often forgotten

The letter, “It’s citizens who make up a militia” suggests that the Second Amendment authors intended to create a militia based on the Minuteman model that could independently rise up against a tyrannical government. The writer quotes the Second Amendment reference to a “well-regulated militia” but only provides a definition for the word “militia.” He does not address the age-old wording problem in the 2nd amendment – the adjective “well-regulated.”

As I see the current controversy, most people agree on the militia part, they disagree on the source of regulation for it.

I went to the American Heritage Dictionary and searched for “well-regulated.” There was no entry, so I tried “regulated” and got “regulate.” The first definition was “To control and direct according to rule, principle, or law.”

Merriam-Webster defines “regulate” as “a: to govern or direct according to rule b (1): to bring under the control of law or constituted authority (2) : to make regulations for or concerning .

Clearly the dictionary meaning of “regulate” includes government authority.

The American Heritage Dictionary has some 17 entries for “well,” so I can’t even go there.

So, why does the Second Amendment include the compound word “well-regulated?” Why not just say “militia” or “private militia” or “Minuteman militia” or some other wording? I don’t know.

Using all these dictionary entries, however, it appears that one can make an argument that a well-regulated militia is exactly the opposite of the independent Minuteman model, and, that a well-regulated militia could act only under the direction of the government.

No wonder this issue won’t go away.

Francis J. Lynch

Edmonds

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Friday, Dec. 15

A sketchy look at the day in politics and popular culture.… Continue reading

Editorial: Congress must renew children’s insurance program

Some 9 million children depend on CHIP for health care. Not renewing it would be costly and cruel.

Gerson: To save the GOP, the party will have to lose

The only way to save the Republican Party from Trumpism is to rebuild it on its ruins.

Harrop: Yes, even some Republicans glad Jones won in ‘Bama

But there is no way to massage the results as a win for President Trump. Change is in the air.

Ignatius: With law and facts against him, Trump pounds table

Even as Mueller’s investigation continues, the trail of evidence points to Trump campaign collusion.

Farmers need to see more support from Rep. Rick Larsen

Our longtime representative in Congress, Rick Larsen, represents many farmers who steward… Continue reading

Gov. Inslee a threat to my wallet

Gov. Jay Inslee’s comment and concerns about President Trump being chaotic, unbalanced… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Thursday, Dec. 14

A sketchy look at the day in politics and society.… Continue reading

Will: Moore’s loss hasn’t lifted stain of Trump’s endorsement

After his support of the grotesque, Trump should be shunned by all but his diehard supporters.

Most Read