What’s behind Lovick’s veto?

What is the real reason John Lovick vetoed the 3-2 council decision to keep the county’s tech department under the county auditor?

Money? Power?

It appears the continuing work of Carolyn Weikel to “mend fences with other county departments, improving the way the county handles public records requests and examining data-storage costs” is disregarded by Mr. Lovick and deemed not necessary.

Is it not possible for the executive’s office to work in support of the council members for the betterment of Snohomish County?

The leadership crisis under Reardon has not passed, as Mr. Lovick states or these steps to improve processes in our government would not be deemed necessary.

Well, when elections for the County Executive and council members who choose not to work as a team come again, we know what we can do.

Carleen Lorenz


More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, Nov. 20

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: School funding half-full, half-empty, but not ample

The Supreme Court says the state’s school funding plan won’t meet its deadline. So there’s work to do.

Simoneaux: In service of science, a month among icebergs

A NOAA ship takes scientists into an Antarctic ice field, when the path out starts to close in.

Saunders: Trump not repeating mistakes he made on ACA repeal

The president is taking care not to alienate Senate Republicans before the vote on tax reform.

Milbank: Not hearing what they want to, GOP simply ignores

Nonpartisan arbiters of fact are being disregarded on tax law, health care and judicial worthiness.

Snohomish PUD hydro project will harm salmon

A Nov. 9 article in The Herald focused on declining salmon and… Continue reading

Frontier should keep lifeline payphones in service

The public telephone at the Verlot service ranger station is a service… Continue reading

Vote makes it clear: No pot shops in Snohomish

The advisory vote on Proposition 1 in Snohomish on retail marijuana sales… Continue reading

Why gut Medicaid to pay for bombs?

Donald Trump, in a fit of pique over not being able to… Continue reading

Most Read