‘Yes’ to Everett’s school bond

Voters will weigh in again on the Everett School District bond that failed to reach the 60 percent threshold in February. A “yes” vote not only benefits current and future students, but signals to new residents and employers that district families put a premium on K-12 education.

For voters, the charge is to separate the sometimes-acrimonious politics of the school board from the educational needs of area children. To sandbag a bond over the handling of the district’s new administration building is cold comfort to students requiring more classroom space at Silver Lake and Hawthorne Elementary. It’s a form of self-flagellation: Annoy the district by punishing students and, by extension, the community.

District leaders made a tactical decision to revisit the bond as soon as possible and forward an identical package to voters. For some, this reinforces the narrative that the district is a wee listening-challenged. The supposition of supporters is that pro-bond voters weren’t mobilized in February, but they will be come April 22.

We hope that’s true, because another “no” vote has consequences: Flight to private schools and incentive to uproot to better-performing school districts. How will Realtors spin it? “May I show you something in Shoreline or Mukilteo?”

As we noted earlier this year, a measure that preserves a stable tax rate and provides for the next generation of K-12 students defines the public interest.

The bond is the product of a protracted process, with discussions at 14 board meetings since 2011, comprehensive work sessions, long-range enrollment and facilities-planning updates, and a long-term capital facilities review. Public and cross-sector participation underscored inclusion with students, board, staff and the community. The goal was to harmonize the bond with the district’s strategic plan, capacity and enrollment projections, a facilities’ inventory, and anticipation of future needs such as full-day kindergarten and K-3 class-size reductions. It’s a case study in complex planning that puts students and taxpayers first.

The district itself is massive ­— 15 miles long with shifting demographics. Beginning in the late 1960s, administrators began methodical planning to align bonds and levies with forecast needs.

The stable-tax rate plan for $259.4 million ($6.55 per $1,000 of assessed home value, the same rate as in 2013) involves new construction, modernization and new technology. Phase 1 of a new high school (housing approximately 750 students), synthetic turf fields at two high schools, and building upgrades.

Make your vote count on April 22. Vote yes.

More in Opinion

Editorial cartoons for Monday, Dec. 18

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Editorial: Coordinated effort a good cure for opioid crisis

Agencies are using their response to emergencies to guide their work in fighting an epidemic.

Simoneaux: A few of Larry’s favorite things at Christmas

In no particular order: lights, cards, guests, eggnog and protecting ornaments from the dog’s tail.

Rampell: CPAs, tax lawyers will do fine after ‘simplification’

Hastily drafted GOP tax reforms will keep attorneys busy exploiting the new loopholes created.

Saunders: What’s behind Trump’s mistrust of intelligence, media

The former acting head of the CIA says political forays by both have alienated the president.

Why has value changed in Everett arena’s naming rights?

The Dec. 13 Herald article by Jim Davis’ “Angel of Winds pays… Continue reading

Alabama election may point to change in leadership

In response to the Dec. 14 letter to the editor, “Trump presidency… Continue reading

Attorney General already running for governor

I almost choked on my Cheerios when I read State Attorney General… Continue reading

Editorial cartoons for Sunday, Dec. 17

A sketchy look at the day in politics.… Continue reading

Most Read