Energy bars actually rather weak on nutrition

  • By Sally Squires / The Washington Post
  • Monday, August 2, 2004 9:00pm
  • Life

They provide the promise of a quick portable meal, an afternoon energy boost or a way to eat healthfully while traveling.

Born in the world of competitive athletics, nutrition or energy bars have moved into the mainstream: These days they’re often gobbled by sedentary desk jockeys rather than solely by the mountain climbers and elite athletes who first made them popular. Sales of the bars are projected to reach more than $3 billion in the United States this year, according to the Nutrition Business Journal, a California publication that tracks the food industry. Companies from Atkins to the Zone have gotten into the act.

How some leading energy bars fared in our taste-test survey. Fat is listed in grams. Bars range from 1.5 to 2.5 ounces. Prices may vary.

Atkins Advantage, Chocolate Mocha Crunch Score: 2.4 Calories: 220 Fat: 10 Saturated fat: 6 Price: $2.49 Comments: “Off-putting, artificial taste”; “just nasty.”

Balance Gold Triple Layer Energy Bar, Chocolate Peanut Butter Score: 4.6 Calories: 210 Fat: 7 Saturated fat: 4 Price $1.53 Comments – One taster called it close to a candy bar.

Clif Bar, Crunchy Peanut Butter Score: 3.4 Calories: 250 Fat: 6 Saturated fat: 1.5 Price: $1.49 Comments: Some tasters had trouble “choking” this one down.

EAS Advantage Edge, Chocolate Peanut Crisp Score: 5.2 Calories: 220 Fat: 6 Saturated fat: 3 Price $2.19 Comments: “I like this one; almost Rice Krispies Treat-ish; I’d buy it!”

Luna Nutz Over Chocolate Score: 4.7 Calories: 180 Fat: 4.5 Saturated fat: 2.5 Price: $1.59 Comments: “Great crunch, airy and well-balanced; almost could be a Rice Krispies Treat substitute.”

Myoplex Lite Nutrition Bar, Blueberry Cobbler Crunch Score: 3.1 Calories: 190 Fat: 3.5 Saturated fat: 2.5 Price $0.85 Comments: “Too dry; flavor is undefinable.”

Oneway Energy Bar Peanut butter whey protein Score: 4.8 Calories: 170 Fat: 6 Saturated fat: 3 Price: $1.99 Comments: “Very candylike”; another taster raved about the nuts and caramel flavor, but wasn’t sure it would satisfy hunger.

PowerBar, Peanut Butter Score: 3.8 Calories: 240 Fat: 3.5 Saturated fat: 0.5 Price: $1.39 Comments: Some tasters described it as bland and weird, with a texture similar to Mary Jane candy.

SlimFast, Chocolate Brownie Score: 3.4 Calories: 200 Fat: 8 Saturated fat: 4 Price: $2.19 Comments: “Horrible mouth feel and a flavor that seems fake.”

SlimFast Meal Bar, Caramel Crispy Peanut Score: 5.5 Calories: 220 Fat: 6 Saturated fat: 4 Price: $1.19 Comments: “Helped by salty, peanut-butterlike flavor. It’s a little gooey, but smooth.”

Snickers Marathon, Chewy Chocolate Peanut Score: 4.4 Calories: 220 Fat: 7 Saturated Fat: 1.5 Price $1.65 Comments – “This one’s dry despite appearance. On the plus side, you probably burn lots of calories chewing it.”

Zone Perfect, Fudge Graham Score: 6 Calories: 210 Fat: 7 Saturated Fat: 3 Price $1.59 Comments – “Nice … enjoyable flavor … seems almost like a treat.”

To learn more, visit www.washingtonpost.com /leanplateclub.

So what exactly do these bars provide nutritionally?

“There’s nothing magic in them,” said registered dietitian Nancy Clark, author of the “Sports Nutrition Guidebook.” “Even though they’re marketed to be easily digestible or an energizer, another snack would do that. Many people think that anything wrapped in a package is magic in terms of enhancing performance, but they’re just 200 expensive calories.”

One appeal of energy bars, of course, is convenience. They don’t require refrigeration and are unlikely to spoil or crumble for months.

Just don’t expect them to offer a nutritional advantage. Energy bars often boast of their high protein, but they often also pack added sugars and saturated or trans fat.

“They’re absolutely delicious,” she said, munching on one during a recent interview. “They have chocolate and frosting and fudge and Rice Krispies. But who am I fooling? This is sugar-coated protein with vitamins added to it.”

Compare that to a glass of skim milk and a medium banana (10 grams of protein, 40 grams of carbs, 185 calories) which has about the same nutritional value as that Clif bar.

Most bars, at $1 to $3 each, will cost as least twice as much as the banana and milk. And while energy bars are increasingly billed as meal substitutes, “they’re not really big enough for a meal replacement,” Clark said. “You’d need to eat two to three of them” to feel full.

Except that you might not want to, based on a recent and decidedly unscientific Lean Plate Club taste test of a dozen leading energy bars. Even the best-rated bars, including one from a major candy maker, averaged only modest scores for taste. Many fared much worse.

Asked whether they would purchase any of the bars as a snack or meal replacement, most participants said not a chance – unless, of course, they were starving.

To conduct this blind taste test, we purchased 11 leading energy bars (based on national sales) from local stores. Added to the mix was a ringer, the Snickers Marathon Chewy Chocolate Peanut bar made by Mars Inc.

The taste test was conducted late on a Friday afternoon, a time when deadline pressure and hunger rises. Participants – all Washington Post newsroom personnel – were invited to try as many of the bite-size samples as they desired. They were asked to rate the taste on a scale of 1 (terrible) to 10 (great). Scores were then tallied and divided by the number of people who tasted each bar to arrive at an average score.

Not one bar earned a 10 from even a single taster, although a few bars snagged an occasional 9.

The top average score was a 6 for the Zone Perfect Fudge Graham bar. Least favorite: Atkins Advantage Chocolate Mocha Crunch Bar, which averaged 2.4.

Here are some for tips in choosing energy bars:

Let taste be your guide. Nearly every bar appealed to at least one taster, yet even the highest-scoring bars had detractors who couldn’t stomach them. You may have to taste a bunch to find one you like – or can tolerate.

Read the labels carefully. The Atkins Advantage bar had 10 grams of fat – the highest in the test, including six grams of saturated fat. That’s two grams more than a small McDonald’s burger and bun. Lowest in fat: PowerBar (the leading U.S. seller) and Myoplex Lite. Each had 3.5 grams of fat and was low in saturated fat – less than a gram for the PowerBar, 2.5 grams for Myoplex. The SlimFast Chocolate Brownie Bar and the Clif Bar Crunchy Peanut Butter were the only two brands to note on their labels that they had zero trans fat.

Make it your whey. Energy bars often have more protein than traditional candy or snack bars, which is why they have been favored by athletes. Their protein generally comes from whey (a milk protein), soybeans, nuts or a combination of all three. Highest protein of any bar tested: Atkins Advantage, with 20 grams. Both Zone Perfect and SlimFast’s Chocolate Brownie had 16 grams. Dig deep. Be aware that there are different types of products in the category, each aimed at a different niche and (perhaps) delivering a different balance of nutrients. All bars come in single servings, making portion control easy. Products are constantly changing. Since our testing two weeks ago, SlimFast has introduced a new bar with less sugar.

Consider other healthy snacks instead. Low-fat chocolate milk “is as effective as a recovery food” as energy bars after a workout, Clark said.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Life

Photo courtesy of Historic Everett Theatre
The Elvis Challenge takes place Saturday at the Historic Everett Theatre.
A&E Calendar for May 8

Send calendar submissions to features@heraldnet.com. To ensure your item is seen by… Continue reading

Kyle Parker paddles his canoe along the Snohomish River next to Langus Riverfront Park on Thursday, May 8, 2025 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Tip to Tip: Kyle Parker begins his canoe journey across the country

The 24-year-old canoe fanatic started in Neah Bay and is making his way up the Skykomish River.

Photo provided by Subaru U.S. Media Center
Subaru Adds Bronze And Onyx Trims to 2025 Ascent

Three-Row Family SUV Delivers Equal Parts Safety And Comfort

The 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid SUV (Provided by Hyundai).
2025 Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid evokes outdoor adventure

Boxy styling leaves lots of room for gear. A refined ride ensures comfort around town.

The 2025 Toyota Sienna minivan in the top-level Platinum grade (Provided by Toyota).
2025 Toyota Sienna maintains reputation for fuel efficiency

Every model in the minivan’s lineup has a hybrid powertrain.

An autumn-themed display at Wagner Jewelers in Marysville. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Shine bright with Snohomish County’s top jewelry finds

Three dazzling shops where elegance, craft, and sparkle come together.

The 2025 Lexus TX 350 is a three-row luxury SUV. It’s offered in Base, Premium, Luxury, and F Sport Handling grades (Provided by Lexus).
2025 Lexus TX 350 welcomes new F Sport Handling model

Unique exterior highlights, a glass roof and sport-tuned suspension are among the attractions.

Hybrid Touring Photo Provided by Subaru U.S. Media Center
2025 Subaru Forester Hybrid Increases Fuel Economy And Range

Sixth-Generation Model Receives Complete Refresh

Image from Pexels.com
Top 3 Cannabis Shops You’ll Love in Snohomish County

Looking for quality products and good energy? Let’s discover the top spots.

Image from Canva.com
Chic & unique: The top 3 boutiques in Snohomish County you need to visit

From trendy finds to timeless pieces, discover the hidden gems that are redefining local fashion.

Image from Canva.com
Find your next favorite read in Snohomish County

Explore three of the finest bookshops where stories and community come together

Image from Canva.com
Say “I Do” to these stunning wedding venues

From rustic barns to elegant halls, discover where love stories in Snohomish County begin.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.