BOISE, Idaho – After failing to halt two timber sales in Washington and Oregon in federal court, environmental groups now hope to scuttle the projects by accusing Boise Cascade Co. of reneging on its 2003 promise not to buy wood from old-growth forests.
The Boise-based company began logging 10 million board feet of timber in the Deschutes National Forest in eastern Oregon last week. It expects to begin cutting 6.5 million board feet from the Wenatchee National Forest in northeastern Washington within days. Both areas were damaged by 2003 fires.
Environmentalists say it’s old growth. Boise Cascade says it isn’t.
Forestry experts watching the fight say it highlights the difficulty of defining just what makes up old-growth forests, which for years have been at the center of the clash between loggers and conservationists. It’s made even more contentious because only limited research exists on the best way to promote forest health.
“You have the environmental community saying, ‘If you touch it at all, it’s contaminated and you won’t end up with a natural situation.’ And you have the company saying, ‘It’s a light touch,’” said Bob Edmonds of the University of Washington College of Forest Resources. “There’s a lot of opinion, and it’s not based on really good science.”
In Oregon, the B&B fire that started Aug. 19, 2003, burned 91,000 acres of the Deschutes National Forest. That same month, the Fischer fire in the Wenatchee National Forest burned 16,000 acres.
U.S. Forest Service managers in both states decided on salvage logging, and planned to use money from the timber sales to pay for replanting.
But environmental groups, including Conservation Northwest of Bellingham, objected, saying that the land was within areas designated by the 1994 Northwest Forest Plan as a reserve for old-growth trees and wildlife habitat. The groups sued in U.S. District Court, arguing the reserves should be left alone.
The ongoing lawsuits have so far failed to halt the logging.
Now, the environmentalists are reminding Boise Cascade of its 2003 promise to stop cutting timber from old-growth forests in the U.S. by 2004, hoping to pressure it into pulling out of the projects. The company made the pledge after it lost customers, including Kinko’s paper products and sportswear companies Patagonia and L.L. Bean, amid concerns over its practices.
“What’s happened is companies like Boise Cascade have provided friendly lip service to conservation organizations, saying, ‘We’re not going to take old-growth trees,’ ” said Karen Ganey, a Rainforest Action Network activist who spent Thursday morning tying green ribbons on trees near the company’s Boise headquarters. “Then, they go in and buy those two (old-growth) timber sales.”
Boise Cascade officials, who are removing Ganey’s ribbons, disagree.
“From our point of view, nothing has changed. The commitment we made in 2003 is still in place today,” said Mike Moser, a spokesman. The timber sales are “not in old-growth forests. The trees being removed are primarily dead or dying. Green trees are being left behind.”
The company – and some scientists – say while there may be large trees in the areas slated for removal by Boise Cascade, a century of fire suppression and logging east of the Cascade Range has created forests different from what were common in the region before the arrival of Europeans.
By removing some of the trees and replanting, foresters can help restore the original character of the region’s forests and promote old-growth stands of native trees such as ponderosa pine, said Mick Mueller, fire ecologist with the Wenatchee River Ranger District.
“The mere appearance of a few large trees does not an old-growth forest make,” Mueller said.
Still, environmentalists said more than 100 trees that survived the 2003 fires have been labeled for cutting. They’re still alive and exceed the diameter that should be cut, activists said.
They also argue that Forest Service employees such as Mueller are under the thumb of President Bush to extract maximum value from the nation’s trees for the logging industry.
“The Forest Service doesn’t want to define anything as old growth, unless you’re going to put it into a grove and name it after Lady Bird Johnson,” said Paul West, a Rainforest Action Network spokesman.
Still, there has been a push toward reconciliation. At a Sept. 7 meeting in San Francisco, Boise Cascade chief Tom Stevens and environmentalists agreed to a cooperative study of appropriate definitions of old-growth to prevent future clashes.
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
