Court throws wrench in plans for Grays Harbor oil terminal

Associated Press

By Gene Johnson, Associated Press

SEATTLE — The Washington Supreme Court threw a major wrench Thursday in plans for a big oil terminal on the coast, saying the proposal must be reviewed under a 1989 state law designed to protect marine life following the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska.

In the latest of a string of victories for tribal and environmental groups challenging fossil fuel projects in the Northwest, the justices unanimously reversed decisions by a state board and the state Court of Appeals, which held the Ocean Resources Management Act did not cover plans by Houston-based Contanda to ship crude out of Grays Harbor.

Kristen Boyles, an attorney with the environmental law Earthjustice, which represents groups that challenged the project, called the opinion “vitally important for Washington state coastal protection.”

“The opinion is clear that extra protective measures apply to these kinds of crude oil projects,” Boyles said. “The requirements are such that I don’t believe the terminal will be able to go forward. It’s dead.”

Westway Terminal, recently renamed Contanda, wants to expand its existing methanol facility in Hoquiam to receive up to 17.8 million barrels of oil a year, including from the Bakken region of North Dakota and Montana, for shipping to refineries in California and Puget Sound. The plans include the construction of four aboveground storage tanks that would each hold up to 8.4 million gallons, with a trainload of oil arriving every three days.

In an emailed statement, Contanda President G.R. “Jerry” Cardillo said the company disagrees with the ruling but will work to make the project happen.

“Considering no review criteria have ever been applied to any other project since the law’s enactment, we will work with the city of Hoquiam to determine the path forward,” he said. “We look forward to building and operating this project safely under the stringent guidelines laid out in the Environmental Impact Statement, and to providing jobs, tax revenue and other economic benefits to the Grays Harbor community.”

In court, the company argued — and Hoquiam, the state Department of Ecology and Court of Appeals agreed — that the Ocean Resources Management Act did not apply to the proposal because it was an expansion of an existing terminal and because the project would be located onshore, rather than in the water.

The Supreme Court said that reading of the law was far too narrow.

“Because the entire purpose of respondents’ projects is to store and transfer fuel from Washington’s coast to Washington’s waters, the projects fit squarely within ORMA’s broad reach,” Justice Susan Owens wrote.

Among other requirements, such projects cannot be permitted under the law unless applicants show “significant local, state, or national need” for the proposed activity; that there is no reasonable alternative to meet that need; and that there will likely be “no long-term significant adverse impacts to coastal or marine resources.”

The Quinault Indian Nation, Sierra Club and community groups challenged three oil terminal projects initially proposed for Grays Harbor, successfully forcing additional environmental reviews in 2013. Two of the projects have dropped out, leaving only the Contanda proposal.

In late September, the Department of Ecology issued its final environmental review, which called for dozens of steps to protect the coast, including tug escorts for oil tankers in the harbor and other spill prevention and response measures. But the review also found that “no mitigation measures would completely eliminate the possibility of a spill, fire, or explosion, nor would they completely eliminate the adverse consequences.”

Hoquiam had been weighing whether to grant a permit for the project. City Administrator Brian Shay did not immediately return a message seeking comment, and the Department of Ecology was reviewing the court’s decision.

“We are just elated,” said Arthur Grunbaum, president of Friends of Grays Harbor. The 1989 law, he said, “gives recognition to the sustainable resources within the harbor — the fishing industry, the crabbing industry, those resources that depend on clean water. This project would dramatically affect those resources in the long run.”

Early this month, Washington’s outgoing public lands commissioner said he would refuse to allow the state’s aquatic lands to be used for a major coal-export terminal along the Columbia River. Last spring, the Army Corps of Engineers and the state Department of Natural resources denied necessary permissions for the Gateway Pacific Terminal, a proposed deep-water coal port at Cherry Point, north of Bellingham, saying the terminal would interfere with the Lummi Nation’s treaty-reserved fishing rights.

A proposal to build the nation’s largest oil-by-rail marine terminal on the Columbia River in Vancouver, Washington, remains alive. The Tesoro Savage Vancouver Energy terminal would handle about 360,000 barrels of crude oil a day.

Talk to us

More in Local News

The entrance to the new free COVID vaccination site at the Everett Mall on Monday, Jan. 17, 2022. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Free mass-vaccination site opens Tuesday at Everett Mall

Hundreds of appointments are up for grabs at the state-run site, which will offer initial doses, boosters and pediatric shots.

Michael Jensen, left, and Nathan Jensen, right, pick up trash in their encampment that they being forced to clear out of by Parks Department the near Silver Lake on Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2019 in Everett, Wa. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Annual homeless count could shed light on pandemic’s impact

Snohomish County canceled its 2021 point-in-time count. Officials hope this year’s will bring clarity.

Marysville Pilchuck student Gianna Frank and Marysville firefighters bag puzzles and snacks in Marysville, Washington on January 17, 2022. (Isabella Breda / The Herald)
In Marysville, care packages filled in an MLK act of service

Some bags will go to seniors, some to survivors of domestic violence and some to those living with housing insecurity.

Index School (Index School District)
Voters to decide fate of critical school funding measures

Levies to pay for staff and programs are on the Feb. 8 ballot in districts across Snohomish County.

A crew member carries plywood to steathe a roof as of the Home Repair Service Program Friday morning in Brier, Washington on January 14, 2022. (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Habitat for Humanity program helps Brier homeowners stay put

The nonprofit’s Home Repair Service program gave a senior couple a new roof — and hope.

Snohomish County Courthouse. (Herald file)
Lawmakers consider Snohomish County request for 2 more judges

It’s been 15 years since the Legislature approved a new Superior Court judge for the county.

NO CAPTION NECESSARY: Logo for the Cornfield Report by Jerry Cornfield. 20200112
Ports and potties, and a delay in long-term-care payroll tax

Here’s what’s happening on Day 8 of the 2022 session of the Washington Legislature.

A mail carrier delivers mail along Dubuque Road in Snohomish on Wednesday, Jan. 12, 2022. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Mail delays frustrate and perplex Snohomish residents

One woman waited two weeks for delivery. Then came “an avalanche of mail.” The Postal Service blames snow and staffing issues.

Sam Dawson administers a collection swab herself Thursday afternoon at the walk-up COVID testing center on Wetmore Ave in Everett, Washington on January 13, 2022. (Kevin Clark / The Herald)
Sketchy firm’s COVID-test sites shut down as questions mount

The Center for COVID Control will close an Everett site and others around the U.S. as officials take a closer look.

Most Read