WASHINGTON — The food industry’s private inspection system failed to catch filthy conditions at a peanut company blamed for a nationwide salmonella outbreak because the firm itself hired the inspectors, lawmakers said today.
The House Energy and Commerce investigations subcommittee released new documents that showed how private inspectors hired by Peanut Corp. of America failed to find long-standing sanitary problems at company facilities. Peanut Corp. is at the center of a nationwide outbreak that has sickened nearly 700 people and is being blamed for at least nine deaths.
“There is an obvious and inherent conflict of interest when an auditor works for the same supplier it is evaluating,” said Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., chairman of the subcommittee. He termed it a “cozy relationship.”
Last summer, Peanut Corp.’s private inspector, a company called AIB, awarded the company a certificate in 2008 for “superior” quality at its Plainview, Texas, processing plant. This year, salmonella was discovered there.
The outbreak was initially traced to a Peanut Corp. company facility in Blakely, Ga. Later, contamination was found at the Texas plant. Peanut Corp. is under criminal investigation for allegedly shipping products it knew to be tainted. Owner Stewart Parnell has refused to answer questions from lawmakers, citing constitutional protections against self-incrimination.
Federal law does not require food companies to pay for their own inspections of suppliers. Nor are industry labs and inspectors required to tell the government about any problems they find.
At least one food company that used its own inspectors, Nestle, ultimately decided not to do business with Peanut Corp.
The committee released a 2002 Nestle inspection report of Peanut Corp’s Blakely plant. “They found that the place was filthy,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif.
A second audit by Nestle of Peanut Corp.’s Texas facility in 2006 also found major pest control and other problems. The audit said that would disqualify the plant from supplying chopped peanut pieces to Nestle, to sprinkle atop drumstick ice-cream cones.
Auditors found at least 50 mouse carcasses in and around the plant and also a dead pigeon “lying on the ground near the peanut-receiving door.”
The audit also said the plant had no pathogen-monitoring plan and noted that one needed to be developed for the plant to be in compliance with audit standards.
Companies that bought ingredients from Peanut Corp. said they had no way of defending themselves against a supplier they accuse of deliberately breaking the rules and covering up.
“I think we did everything we could do,” Kellogg Co. CEO David Mackay told the committee.
“The issue was that (Peanut Corp.) acted in a dishonest and unethical way,” he added.
Lawmakers and the Obama administration say the problem goes beyond a rogue company, and major reforms are needed. Legislation has been introduced in Congress to take food safety oversight away from the Food and Drug Administration and give it to a new agency with stronger legal powers and more funding.
Kellogg today joined consumer groups in saying the U.S. food safety system is broken. The world’s largest cereal maker lost $70 million in the salmonella outbreak after it had to recall millions of packages of peanut butter crackers and cookies.
Mackay said he wants food safety placed under a new leader in the Health and Human Services Department. He is also calling for new requirements that all food companies have written safety plans, annual federal inspections of facilities that make high-risk foods and other reforms.
Peanut Corp. produced not only peanut butter, but peanut paste, an ingredient found in foods from granola bars and dog biscuits to ice cream and cake. More than 3,490 products have been recalled, including some Kellogg’s Austin and Keebler peanut butter sandwich crackers.
The committee released a Jan. 7 e-mail exchange between Peanut Corp. owner Parnell and Joe Valenza, vice president of King Nut, an Ohio company whose products were the first to be recalled. King Nut bought cafeteria-sized containers of peanut butter from Parnell’s firm, and distributed them to nursing homes, schools and other facilities.
In his e-mail, Parnell sent news reports of the outbreak investigation, and said, “Joe, I’m sure it’s something we did.”
Valenza responded that he was going to issue a recall of all the peanut butter.
Parnell wrote back: “Now my heart is really in my throat. … I think I’m going to church tonight.”
Talk to us
> Give us your news tips.
> Send us a letter to the editor.
> More Herald contact information.
