Justices consider compliance costs for clean-air rules


Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices voiced skepticism today about ordering the federal government to change decades of clean-air policy and begin considering compliance costs — not just health benefits — in setting nationwide air-quality standards.

A lawyer for industry groups asked the justices to rule that federal Clean Air Act requires the Environmental Protection Agency to weigh the cost of reducing harmful emissions against the benefits of improved air quality.

Justice John Paul Stevens said the industry groups appeared to be seeking a rule that the EPA must set air-quality standards "to protect the public health, provided it doesn’t cost too much."

Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist told the industry groups’ lawyer, "You say you don’t know how we can live with" a requirement that the EPA consider only health issues and not costs. "We have lived with it for 20 years" since a lower court decided that issue, the chief justice added.

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg questioned how a cost-benefit analysis would work. "You are adding something that will create another morass," she said.

The justices are expected to issue a ruling by July that could have a major impact on clean-air rules and possibly on regulatory actions by other federal agencies.

The Clean Air Act, adopted in 1970, requires the EPA to set national air-quality standards to "protect the public health." The agency is to use criteria that "accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge" for identifying pollution’s effects on health.

The Clinton administration is asking the justices to reverse a lower court ruling that said the EPA went too far in adopting tougher clean-air standards in 1997. The appeals court ruled for the industry groups on that question, but rejected their argument that the EPA should consider the cost of compliance in setting air-quality standards.

Edward Warren, representing the American Trucking Associations, U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups, said the EPA "wishes to regulate every nook and cranny of this environment for air pollution reasons" without a clear standard for doing so.

"There has to be some common sense brought to bear" by balancing costs and health benefits, Warren added.

Solicitor General Seth Waxman, representing the government, said, "The health in this country is vastly better now than it was in 1970." Under the clean-air law, the EPA does not consider compliance costs in setting the standard, but it does consider costs in deciding how states will try to meet the standard, Waxman said.

Justices Stephen G. Breyer, Antonin Scalia and Sandra Day O’Connor also expressed doubts about requiring a cost-benefit analysis.

"I’ve listened to a lot of vague language from you and I don’t understand what it is that you’re saying," O’Connor said.

Several justices also questioned Waxman closely about how much leeway the EPA believes it has to set the air-quality standard.

"How do you decide how much risk is too much risk, or is that just up to the agency?" Scalia asked. Later, he added, "You still haven’t given me a criterion of where you stop."

O’Connor questioned whether the EPA could decide that electric cars would improve public health, and then lower the air-quality standard to force their use.

Waxman said the agency would not consider such issues in setting the standard. And, he said, the clean-air law does not let the EPA set a standard that would require "zero risk" to health.

In 1997, the EPA adopted air standards that imposed new limits on soot and ozone, a major component of smog. They were challenged by industry groups, and a federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., blocked the EPA from enforcing the rules in May 1999.

Some observers believe that if the Supreme Court decided the EPA took too much of Congress’ power when it set the clean-air rules, it could affect the regulatory power of other federal agencies with broad congressional mandates. For example, federal law directs the Federal Communications Commission to regulate broadcasting in the "public interest."

The cases are Browner v. American Trucking Associations, 99-1257, and American Trucking Associations v. Browner, 99-1426.

Copyright ©2000 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Talk to us

More in Local News

Members of South County Fire practice onboarding and offboarding a hovering Huey helicopter during an interagency disaster response training exercise at Arlington Municipal Airport on Tuesday, June 6, 2023, in Arlington, Washington. The crews learned about and practiced safe entry and exit protocols with crew from Snohomish County Volunteer Search and Rescue before begin given a chance to do a live training. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Snohomish, King counties train together for region’s next disaster

Dozens of agencies worked with aviators Tuesday to coordinate a response to a simulated earthquake or tsunami.

Police stand along Linden Street next to orange cones marking pullet casings in a crime scene of a police involved shooting on Friday, May 19, 2023 in Everett, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
Lake Stevens man identified in Everett manhunt, deadly police shooting

Travis Hammons, 34, was killed by officers following a search for an armed wanted man in a north Everett neighborhood.

Funko mascots Freddy Funko roll past on a conveyor belt in the Pop! Factory of the company's new flagship store on Aug. 18, 2017.  (Dan Bates / The Herald)
Lawsuit: Funko misled investors about Arizona move

A shareholder claims Funko’s decision to relocate its distribution center from Everett to Arizona was “disastrous.”

1 stabbed at apartment in Lynnwood

The man, 26, was taken to an Everett hospital with “serious injuries.”

A firefighting helicopter carries a bucket of water from a nearby river to the Bolt Creek Fire on Saturday, Sep. 10, 2022, on U.S. Highway 2 near Index, Washington. (Ryan Berry / The Herald)
Red flag fire warning issued west of Cascades

There are “critical fire weather” conditions due to humidity and wind in the Cascades, according to the National Weather Service.

A house fire damaged two homes around 1:30 a.m. Tuesday, June 6, 2023 in Marysville, Washington. (Photo provided by Marysville Fire District)
Fire burns 2 homes in Marysville, killing 2 dogs

Firefighters responded to a report of a fire north of Lakewood Crossing early Tuesday, finding two houses engulfed in flames.

Logo for news use featuring the municipality of Mountlake Terrace in Snohomish County, Washington. 220118
Mountlake Terrace eyes one-time projects for $2.4M in federal funds

Staff recommended $750,000 for a new roof and HVAC at the library, $250,000 toward a nonprofit facility in Lynnwood and more.

The Snohomish River turns along the edge of the Bob Heirman Wildlife Preserve at Thomas’ Eddy on Wednesday, May 3, 2023 in Snohomish, Washington. (Olivia Vanni / The Herald)
To build a healthier Snohomish River, more log jams

About $2.8M in grants will help engineer log jams, tear down levees and promote salmon restoration at Bob Heirman Wildlife Preserve.

Dave "Bronco" Erickson stands next to the pink-and-purple 1991 Subaru Justy hatchback “Pork Chop Express” car that he is seeking to re-home for $500. The car has been on Whidbey Island for years, mainly as yard art. (Andrea Brown / The Herald)
For sale: Whidbey’s fabled ‘Pork Chop Express’ gets great smileage

Asking price is $500 for the 1991 Subaru Justy, a three-cylinder econobox with 65K miles and a transmission as rare as hen’s teeth.

Most Read